Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Dev Biol 2001 Nov 15;2392:270-80. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0434.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Hypaxial muscle migration during primary myogenesis in Xenopus laevis.

Martin BL , Harland RM .

In contrast to many vertebrates, the ventral body wall muscles and limb muscles of Xenopus develop at different times. The ventral body wall forms in the tadpole, while limb (appendicular) muscles form during metamorphosis to the adult frog. In organisms that have been examined thus far, a conserved mechanism has been shown to control migratory muscle precursor specification, migration, and differentiation. Here, we show that the process of ventral body wall formation in Xenopus laevis is similar to hypaxial muscle development in chickens and mice. Cells specified for the migratory lineage display an upregulation of pax3 in the ventro-lateral region of the somite. These pax3-positive cells migrate ventrally, away from the somite, and undergo terminal differentiation with the expression of myf-5, followed by myoD. Several other genes are selectively expressed in the migrating muscle precursor population, including neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), Xenopus kit related kinase (Xkrk1), and Xenopus SRY box 5 (sox5). We have also found that muscle precursor migration is highly coordinated with the migration of neural crest-derived melanophores. However, by extirpating neural crest at an early stage and allowing embryos to develop, we determined that muscle precursor migration is not dependent on physical or genetic interaction with melanophores.

PubMed ID: 11784034
Article link: Dev Biol

Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: kit myf5 myod1 ncam1 pax3 snai2 sox13 sox5

Article Images: [+] show captions