Le Guellec B , Rousseau F , Bied M , Supplisson S .

	Fig. 1. (A) The phylogenetic tree of SLC6 transporter orthologs shows a split between the glycine-specific transporters: GlyT2 is more closely associated with ATB0,+ than with GlyT1 (n = 14, 16, 16, and 17 vertebrate orthologs (see species in SI Appendix, Fig. S1; mouse sequences of six GABA transporters [GABAT: SLC6A1, SLC6A6, SLC6A8, SLC6A11, SLC6A12, and SLC6A13] and the three monoamine transporters [MAT: SLC6A2, SLC6A3, and SLC6A4] were included as outgroups). (B) Higher sequences divergence in vertebrate orthologs of ATB0,+. Plot of the cumulative count (+1 if all orthologs shared the same residue), starting at the first shared arginine (RNNG). (C) Area-proportional Venn diagram distribution of shared and unique residues of mice sequences for the three glycine transporters (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). (D) Amino acid transport shows a remarkable divergence in substrate specificity between ATB0,+ and GlyT1-2. Individual bars represent the current evoked by each amino acid in oocytes expressing GlyT1 (200 µM, n = 2 to 4; Left), GlyT2 (200 µM, n = 4; Middle), or ATB0,+ (1 mM, n = 6 to 7; Right). Amino acids are identified by a single letter code, except sarcosine (Sa) and GABA (γ). Current amplitudes are normalized by the glycine response. (Insets) Application of all amino acids except glycine (A, C, S, L, F, N, K, Q, H, V, T, Y, R, M, I, W, P, E, and D at 200 µM each) do not evoke a current compared to glycine (3.8 mM) in GlyT1-expressing oocytes (2.4%, n = 6, P < 0.001) and GlyT2-expressing oocytes (2.35%, n = 10, P = 0.002). Error bars indicate SEM; paired t test: ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05; ns, not significant.
	Fig. 2. (A) Glycine evokes large inward currents in ATB0,+ -expressing oocytes. Current–voltage relationships (I–Vs) for three glycine concentrations (20 µM [square], 200 µM [triangle], and 2 mM [circle]). (B) SimiIar I–Vs for ATB0,+, GlyT2, and GlyT1 at saturating glycine concentrations (ATB0,+[blue, 2 mM], n = 10, slope = 0.92% mV– 1, R2=1.0, P<2×10−16; GlyT2 [red, 200 µM], n = 11, slope = 1.07% mV– 1, R2=0.998, P<2×10−16; and GlyT1 [green, [Gly]=200 µM], n = 11, slope =0.87% mV– 1, R2=0.998, P=1.78×10−13 ). Glycine currents were normalized by the absolute amplitude at –40 mV, and linear regressions were performed on the –140 to –40 mV voltage range. (C) Glycine dose–response curve for ATB0,+ at VH=−40mV (blue circles, n = 32). Individual curves were fitted by the equation IGly=Imax/(1+EC50/[Gly]o) and then normalized by the maximal amplitude (Imax). Glycine EC50 of ATB0,+ (189.0 ±5.6 µM, n = 21) is higher than for GlyT1 (28 µM, green dashed line) and GlyT2 (25 µM, red dashed line) as previously determined in ref. 9. (D) Anomalous voltage dependency of glycine EC50 of ATB0,+ at hyperpolarized potentials (blue circles, n = 6). Solid and dashed lines are fits to the equation Aeza ξ V+Bezb ξ V (ξ=F/(RT)) , for ATB0,+(A =66.2, B =133.9, za =1.76, zb =–0.185). The curves for GlyT2 (dashed red line, A = 43, B =21.6, za =1.54, zb = 0) and GlyT1 (dashed green line, A =20.5, B =21.7, za =0.7, zb =0) are shown for comparison (9).
	Fig. 3. (A) Combined violin and box plots of transport current amplitudes recorded at –40 mV for different saturating glycine concentrations, i.e., 200 µM for GlyT1 (245.2 ±17.3 nA, n = 85) and GlyT2 (250.6 ±29.7 nA, n = 48) and 1 to 2 mM for ATB 0,+ (1,450.0±98.8 nA, n = 65). (B) Representative PSSCs recorded at the on and off of voltage steps in oocytes expressing GlyT1 (Left; green), GlyT2 (Middle; red), and ATB0, (Right; blue) expressing oocytes. The range of voltage steps varied from +110 mV (ATB0,+ ) or +50 mV (GlyT1 and GlyT2) to –150 mV in decrements of 10 mV. For clarity, only seven traces are shown, from +50 mV to –130 mV in decrements of 30 mV from an holding potential of –40mV. Transporter currents were isolated by subtracting traces recorded with the same voltage step protocol in the presence of specific inhibitors (10 µM ORG24598 [GlyT1], 5 µM ORG25543 [GlyT2], and 1 mM α-MT [ATB0,+]). All residual steady-state components have been subtracted for clarity, and Insets are scaled to the maximal amplitude recorded at the onset of the voltage steps. (C) The charge movement is the time integral of the relaxation currents plotted as a function of voltage (Q-V). Q-Vs for ATB0,+ (blue, n = 38), GlyT2 (red, n = 53), and GlyT1 (green, n = 14)) were fitted with a Boltzmann equation and then normalized by Qmax. Combined violin and box plot distributions of the Boltzmann equation parameters with (D) zmax, (E) V1/2, and (F) Qmax for GlyT1 (green, n = 14), GlyT2 (red, n = 53), and ATB0,+(blue, n = 38).
	Fig. 4. (A) Representative current traces in voltage-clamp oocytes expressing ATB0,+ and held at VH=−20 mV for two applications of glycine (200 µM performed before and after intracellular microinjection; arrow, 20 to 40 nL) of (Top) glycine (1 M) or (Bottom) NaCl (0.1 M) and glycine (1 M). Currents were normalized by the amplitude of the first glycine application (IGly1 ). (B) (Top) Schematic of a typical I–V protocol before and after microinjection of 16 to 20 nL of a solution containing 0.5 M NaCl and glycine. ATB0,+-mediated currents are isolated by subtraction in the presence of α-MT (500 µM). (Bottom) Normalized ATB0,+ I–Vs for two applications of glycine (200 µM) performed before (blue triangles pointing down) and after (orange triangles pointing down) microinjection of 18 nL of a solution containing glycine (0.5 M) and NaCl (0.5 M) which generates only outward currents (orange triangles pointing up). I–V subtractions are indicated in the legend. Data are mean ± SEM for six oocytes. Amplitudes were normalized by the absolute amplitude of the glycine current recorded before injection. (C-E) Shifts in reversal potentials of three I–Vs recorded in ATB0,+-expressing oocytes microinjected with 13 to 23 nL of a concentrated (0.5 M) NaCl + glycine solution for 100-fold change in (C) glycine concentration or 10-fold change in (D) Cl−and (E) Na+concentrations. Currents recorded with the same protocol in the presence of α-MT (500 µM or 1 mM at low Na+) were subtracted. (F) Semilogarithmic plot of reversal potentials for the experiments described in C–E as a function of each cosubstrate concentration ([S]o). The slopes of the reversal potential per decade concentration change were calculated for glycine (orange, 28.6 mV/decade, R2=0.873, P<2.47×10−11, n = 8), Cl−(green, 32.5 mV/decade, R2=0.754, P=2.96×10−6, n = 6), and Na+(red, 84.6 mV/decade, R2=0.983, P<2×10−16, n = 14) with the 95% confidence interval shown in shaded areas. (G) Combined violin and box plot distributions of ATB0,+ reversal potential slopes and stoichiometric coefficients for glycine, Cl−, and Na+.
	Fig. 5. (A) Representative traces of ATB0,+ -PSSCs recorded at the onset of the voltage steps (from +110 mV to –150 mV in decrements of 20 mV; VH=−40 mV) in glycine-free solution containing the indicated Na+ concentration. ATB0,+-specific PSSCs were isolated by subtraction of traces recorded in the presence of α-MT (1 mM); all residual endogenous currents have been subtracted for clarity. Normalized Q-Vs for (B) ATB0,+(n = 14, ±SEM) and (C) GlyT2 (n=7,±SEM) for the four Na+ concentrations shown in A, using the same color code. Datasets are the average of four Q-Vs normalized by the Qmax value for [Na+] =100 mM. The solid lines correspond to the fit of the four-state scheme (SI Appendix, Fig. S9A, scheme 3) depicted above, with the gating, Na+-binding, and Na+-locking steps detailed in SI Appendix, Fig. S9A. The green and blue arrows represent two exit steps from B state that are activated during depolarization, whereas the purple arrows identify steps activated by hyperpolarizing voltage steps. The dashed lines of the Q-Vs are extrapolations of the model outside the experimental voltage range. (D) The apparent charge displacement plotted as function of [Na+] is calculated according to SI Appendix, Eq. 9, for different Vmax (SI Appendix, Fit Procedures). (E) The median voltage (SI Appendix, Fit Procedure, Eq. 10) plotted as a function of [Na+] is estimated as shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S14. (F) Model prediction of ATB0,+-PSSCs for the same conditions as in A. The rate constants are described in SI Appendix, Fit Procedures. The voltage independent rate constants are k120=79s– 1, k230=88 mol– 1 s– 1, and k340=23 s– 1, with dα=0.36, dβ=0.42, and dγ=0.7. The off rate constants are calculated using the equations detailed in SI Appendix, Fig. S9B with zα, zβ, zγ, α0, γ0, and Kd and nH values shown in B.
	Fig. 6. The 3-Na+ coupling limits glycine efflux but not ATB0,+ heteroexchange. (A) Glycine efflux was measured in voltage-clamped oocytes held at –60 mV and microinjected with [14C]-glycine. The outflow of the perfusion solution was collected in the absence (basal; left traces) or presence of glycine (1 mM, glycine-stimulated exchange; right traces) for oocytes expressing GlyT1 (Top; green traces), GlyT2 (Middle; red traces), or ATB0,+ (Bottom; blue traces). Histogram bars show glycine efflux in basal condition and during glycine application measured for each transporter in this experiment. The diagrams illustrate the two components of glycine efflux in these experiments: a transporter-specific pathway that allows exchange in the presence of extracellular glycine and a nonspecific component for glycine leakage by endogeneous transporters of Xenopus oocytes. Data summarized for (B) Glycine-stimulated efflux and (C) basal efflux. ORG24598 inhibited a large fraction of the basal efflux in GlyT1-expressing oocytes, whereas ORG25543 had no significant effect on the basal glycine efflux in GlyT2-expressing oocytes. No inhibitor could be tested for ATB0,+ as its basal efflux was already low. (D–F) We used the high-affinity coagonist site of GluN1-GluN2B NMDARs as a dynamic sensor of the juxtamenbrane glycine concentration produced by transporter-mediated efflux. Indeed, glutamate (2 µM) evoked no or a small current when applied alone in basal condition with oocytes coexpressing GluN1-GluN2B subunits of NMDAR and one of the glycine transporters (dashed traces); glutamate was applied in 0.3 mM BaCl2 (i.e., Ca2+- and Mg2+-free) Ringer’s solution. Currents were normalized by the amplitude of the current evoked by 2 µM Glu + 0.3 µM glycine represented by a vertical ticked bar. However, after glycine uptake (~2 min application of glycine [1 mM] + d-APV [50 µM] in normal Ringer’s solution; SI Appendix, Fig. S16, Inset), glutamate evoked much larger NMDAR currents in GlyT1-coexpressing oocytes, and the potentiation persisted for more than an hour of continuous washing (SI Appendix, Fig. S16). The glutamate-evoked NMDAR current was blocked by NFPS (10 µM, 96.7% inhibition) (E), a fast acting and reversible GlyT1 inhibitor, and by ORG24598 (10 µM, 96.7 ±0.6% inhibition, n = 4) but with slower kinetics. In contrast, glutamate-evoked NMDAR current did not change markedly after glycine uptake in GlyT2- and ATB0,+ -coexpressing oocytes (D and F). (F) Summary of the change in GluN1/GluN2B NMDAR currents evoked by 2 µM Glu applied alone in basal condition and after glycine uptake for oocytes coexpressing GlyT1, GlyT2, and ATB0,+. Current amplitudes were normalized by the absolute amplitude of the current evoked by 2 µM Glu + 0.3 µM d-serine. (G–I) Finally, we tested whether ATB0,+ could gate NMDAR activation by heteroexchange of glycine with leucine. (G) In basal condition, the transport current evoked by leucine (200 µM, cyan trace) in ATB0,+-coexpressing oocytes had much higher amplitude than the NMDAR current evoked by glutamate (2 µM, black trace). Coapplication of leucine with glutamate shows that transporter and receptor currents are independent, with minimal potentiation of NMDARs (magenta). After glycine uptake, ATB0,+-mediated transport current evoked by leucine was reduced by 0.64-fold (cyan traces, from 1.74 to 1.15 µA) while there was little potentiation of the glutamate-evoked current when applied alone (1.66-fold increase, black traces, from 102 to 169 nA). However, coapplication of leucine and glutamate enhanced 32.8-fold the NMDAR response (magenta traces, from 174 nA to 5.74 µA), indicating glycine/leucine heteroexchange. (H) The potentiation of NMDAR current by heteroexchange leucine/glycine was blocked by αMT, an ATB0,+ inhibitor (1 mM, 92.7 ±1.4% inhibition, n = 4). (I) Summary of the change in GluN1-GluN2B NMDAR currents induced by Leu/Gly heteroexchange (IGlu+Leu–ILeu) in basal condition and after glycine uptake for oocytes coexpressing ATB0,+. Currents were normalized by the amplitude measured with 0.3 µM d-serine. Error bars indicate SEM; paired t test: ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
	Fig. S1. Phylogenetic tree of the SLC6 amino acid transporters. The phylogenetic tree of Fig. 1A with the species name of each Vertebrate-ortholog for ProT (n=14), GlyT1 (n =16), GlyT2 (n = 16) and ATB0,+ (n = 17); mouse sequences of six GABA transporters (GABAT: SLC6A1,6,11,12,13), and the three monoamine transporters (MAT:SLC6A2,3,4) were included in the phylogenetic analysis as outgroups.
	Fig. S2. Sequence identities in transmembrane segments. Fraction of sequence identity in the putative transmembrane segments (TMs) of all orthologs shown in Fig. 1A. The human SERT structure was used as a template for TMs delimitation (3).
	Fig. S3. Sequence identities among vertebrates orthologs of ATB0,+, GlyT2 and GlyT1. Radar plot of the cumulative number of sequence identities for each glycine-transporter pair (ATB0,+-GlyT2 (purple), GlyT2-GlyT1 (cyan), ATB0,+-GlyT1 (yelow)). Pair identity shared with PROT are excluded as indicated in the legend.
	Fig. S4. Sequence alignments of mATB0,+, mGlyT2 and mGlyT1. The color code indicates amino acids common for the three transporters (gray, n = 220), and the identity shared between ATB0,+ and GlyT2 (purple, n = 95), ATB0,+ and GlyT1 (orange, n = 43), GlyT1 and GlyT2 (cyan, n = 76). The blue lines represent the putative transmembrane segments based on hSERT structure
	Fig. S5. ATB0,+ transport current is glycine-, Na+- and Cl−-dependent. Glycine applications (red bar: [Gly]=200 µM) does not evoked a current in Na+-free (left trace) and Cl−-free solution (right trace) with ATB0,+-expressing oocytes held at VH = −40 mV. Na+ was substituted by choline (left trace, solid bar) and Cl− was substituted by gluconate (right trace, solid bar).
	Fig. S6. Expression of ATB0,+ increases the linear capacitance of Xenopus oocytes. (A) Left panel: normalized traces of capacitive currents (linear and PSSCs) recorded at the onset of voltage steps (from +50 mV to −130 mV by decrements of 10 mV for a representative ATB0,+-expressing oocyte. Each trace is normalized by the absolute peak current (the trace at VH = −40 mV is not included). Middle panel: same as left in the presence of 1 mM α-MT (blue traces) to block ATB0,+-charge movement. The gray traces represent currents recorded with the same protocol for a representative non-injected oocyte. Right panel: the charge movement of ATB0,+ (orange trace) for a single step at 50 mV after α-MT subtraction. (B) Average Q-Vs of the linear component of capacitive currents in non-injected oocytes (gray, 209 ± 3 nF, n = 33), and oocytes expressing GlyT1 + ORG24598 (green, 227 ± 7 nF, n = 11), GlyT2 + ORG25543 (red, 242.8 ± 5.2 nF, n = 10), and ATB0,+ + α-MT (blue, 320.6 ± 11.7 nF, n = 16). (C) Combined violin and box plots of the distribution of linear membrane capacitance of non-injected oocytes (n = 33), and oocytes expressing GlyT1 (n = 11), GlyT2 (n = 10) and ATB0,+ (n = 50; a group of 34 ATB0,+-expressing oocytes was added by estimating the slope of the Q-V at hyperpolarized potentials).
	Fig. S7. ATB0,+ charge-coupling and turnover rate. (A) linear relationship between glycine uptake and the time integral of the glycine-evoked current for 30-120 s application of 14C-glycine (50 µM, each circle represents a single oocyte expressing ATB0,+). The slope (zT =2.08 e, R2=0.982, p=2.16 10−12), which is the charge coupling per glycine, is in agreement with the 3 Na+/1 Cl− stoichiometry. (B) linear relationship between Imax ([Gly] = 1 to 2 mM) and Qmax for oocytes expressing ATB0,+. An apparent turnover rate (λ = 18 s−1) is derived from the Imax/Qmax slope (29.7 s−1, R2= 0.848, p = 3.77 10−12) using the equation λ =zmax zT Imax Qmax, with zT =2.08 e and zδ=1.26 e). The shaded areas correspond to the 95 % confidence interval.
	Fig. S8. Microinjection of NaCl with glycine is required to reverse GlyT2 but not GlyT1. (A) Representative current traces recorded in voltage-clamped oocytes expressing GlyT1 (top trace, green) or GlyT2 (bottom, red), and held at VH = −20 mV for two applications of glycine (200 µM before and after intracellular microinjection (arrow: 20 to 40nl). Left panels: microinjection of glycine (1M) reverses GlyT1 as shown by a slow rise of the outward current (Iout), but not GlyT2. Right panels: microinjection of NaCl (0.1M) and glycine (1M) increases Iout in GlyT1- and reverses GlyT2. Currents are normalized by the first glycine application (IGly(1)). (B) Summary data for experiments as shown in (A) and Fig. 4A. The bar histograms show the amplitude of Iout (left) normalized by IGly(1) and the relative current evoked by the second glycine application (IGly(2)/IGly()1, right) (mean ±SEM, n are indicated in parenthesis; *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05; Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison).
	Fig. S9. A four-state sequential model for the charge movement of ATB0,+ and GlyT2. (A) The model shows the three kinetic schemes tested here to fit ATB0,+- and GlyT2-Q-Vs as function of Na+. In glycine-free media, outward facing transporters are assumed to be either Na+-unbound (Uc , U) or Na+-bound (B, Bc). The UB scheme (#1) corresponds to the binary Hill model proposed by (4) for GAT1 and is limited to a single binding step for multiple Na+. It is defined by 3 parameters: the microscopic dissociation constant Kd, the Hill coefficient nH, and the equivalent charge zβ. For simplicity, we define βNa,V as the equilibrium constant of the binding step as function of Na+ and voltage. Schemes #2 and #3 include a gating step controlling the access of Na+ to its binding sites. The equilibrium constants are αV and γV for the gating and locking steps, respectively. In the scheme #2, gate closure occurs only in the unbound state (U) whereas it is independent of Na+-binding in scheme #3. At negative potentials all transporters are in state B (fig:S5)). Positive voltage steps trigger gate closure from Na+-unbound (U) and Na+-bound state (B). (B) The zmax and normalized Q-V equations are tabulated for each scheme, with the ∆AICc values estimated from the fit. zmax for scheme #3 conditioned by equality or inequality of the valencies of the Na+-release and Na+-locking paths
	Fig. S10. Decay time course of ATB0,+ transient currents. A Semi-log plot of the 80 to 1 % decay of PSSCs for 3 voltages steps (−120 mV, +10 mV and +90 mV) from vH (−40 mV) for the four concentrations of Na+ indicated (same traces as in Fig. 5 A). Currents were sampled at 20 kHz, and decimated by a factor 5 for clarity. B Examples of fit with a mono (red) and bi-exponential (blue) time course for currents recorded at −120 and +50 mV steps. C Amplitude-weighted time constant
	Fig. S11. The equivalent charge displacement of ATB0,+ is Na+-dependent. (A-B) Q-Vs for GlyT2 (A, n = 1) and ATB0,+ (B, n = 7) for different Na+ concentrations as indicated in the legend panel. The solid lines correspond to the individual fits using a Boltzmann equation, normalized by Qmax for Na+ = 100 mM . (C-D) The solid lines represent plots of the first derivative of the Boltzmann fits shown in A-B for GlyT2 (C) and ATB0,+ (D). The dashed lines are the first derivative of the Hill equation (scheme #1 in S9) with the parameters nH = 1.9, zmax = 0.55 and Kd = 67.4 mM for ATB0,+ and nH = 2.04, zmax =1.13 and Kd = 290 mM for GlyT2
	Fig. S12. Global fits of Q-V(Na) with scheme 1 and 2. (A-D) Global fits of the Q-Vs of ATB0,+ (top) and GlyT2 (bottom) as a function of the Na+ concentration for the kinetic schemes 1 (A), and 2 (B), as described in S9.
	Fig. S13. Distribution of the four states of scheme 3 at different Na+ concentrations. The distribution of the four-state (Uc, U, B, Bc ) of ATB0,+ (left panels) and GlyT2 (right panels) plotted as a function of voltage for the Na+ concentration indicated on the left, using the set of parameters in Fig. 5B-C. The closed circles represent the fraction of the B state at VH= −40 mV.
	Fig. S14. Predicted Qmax convergence at low Na+ concentration at positive voltage. Prediction from scheme 3 shows a reduction of the apparent zmax, and therefore Qmax at low Na+ concentration (Fig. 5D) . Here, we show the extrapolation of ATB0,+- and GlyT2-Q-V(s) calculated for a large, not experimentally accessible, voltage range (−0.4 to 1 V), using the same set of parameters depicted in Figs. 6B-C. As expected for a sequential model, the equilibrium equation of scheme 3 predicts that all four Q-Vs converge to 1 at extreme positive potentials.
	Fig. S15. Na+-dependency of the median voltage. The Q-Vs of ATB0,+ (top) and GlyT2 (bottom) are plotted for four Na+ concentrations as indicated, using the fit parameters of scheme 3. The median voltage (Vmed. ) for equal charge distribution is estimated by numerical integration as described in methods and indicated on the voltage axis of each plot. The darker and lighter shaded areas represent the negative and positive integrals, respectively
	Fig. S16. After glycine uptake, GlyT1-mediated efflux becomes an efficient and prolonged source of coagonist for NMDA receptor activation by glutamate alone. Application of glutamate (2µM) evoked small amplitude NMDAR current in basal conditions (trace a) but becames much larger after (traces b-e) glycine uptake (inset on top) for an oocyte coexpressing GluN1/GluN2B subunits of NMDAR and GlyT1. The potentiation of NMDAR activation by GlyT1-mediated glycine efflux persisted for more than an hour after uptake, indicating small rate of glycine efflux. The holding potential was changed as indicated in the legend, and the glycine accumulation produced by 2 min uptake was estimated from the time-integral of the transport current divided by the Faraday’s constant. Assuming an oocyte water volume of 700 nl, this uptake would increase the intracellular glycine concentration by 1.2 mM.
	Fig. S17. A minimal model for ATB0,+ transport cycle predicts the anomalous voltage-dependence of glycine EC50. A we used a simple four-state model to fit a set of 5 glycine I-Vs obtained with the same ATB0,+-expressing oocyte (1.8 × 1011 transporters) before and after microinjection of 23 nl of NaCl+glycine (0.5M). We used a water volume of 700 nl to estimate the intracellular concentrations produced by microinjection, with initial values in the upper range because of the accumulation already produced by the large glycine current (3.1µA at −40 mV, corresponding to a glycine flux of 15.4pmol s−1). The table of concentrations includes the theoretival reversal potential of ATB0,+. The purpose of this model was to examine the voltage dependence of the EC50, assuming that the rate controlling glycine binding (k1f,k3b) and unbinding (k1b,k3f) are voltage independent. Adding an intrinsic valence of the transporter (zc) that does not contribute to the net charge carried during a cycle was necessary to reduce and balance the valence of the translocation steps for the fully loaded and empty carrier. The limiting rate constant at low and high glycine concentrations are indicated with blue (k1f) and red (k4f) arrows, respectively. B-C glycine I-Vs before (B) and after (C) intracellular microinjection. ATB0,+ steadystate currents were isolated by subtraction using αMT (1 mM) as described in Fig 4.B. The solid lines correspond to the fit using the concentrations for each cosubstrates in the table in A. The rate constants are given in A. DThe EC50 estimated from the model using the rate constants in A shows ATB0,+ characteristic and unusual voltage-dependence at negative voltages

Ahmadi, Facilitation of spinal NMDA receptor currents by spillover of synaptically released glycine. 2003, Pubmed

Ahmadi, Facilitation of spinal NMDA receptor currents by spillover of synaptically released glycine. 2003, Pubmed
Ahmadi, SLC6A14, an amino acid transporter, modifies the primary CF defect in fluid secretion. 2018, Pubmed
Ahmadi, Augmentation of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Function in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells via SLC6A14-Dependent Amino Acid Uptake. Implications for Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis. 2019, Pubmed
Anderson, Human solute carrier SLC6A14 is the beta-alanine carrier. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Apostolides, Rapid, activity-independent turnover of vesicular transmitter content at a mixed glycine/GABA synapse. 2013, Pubmed
Aubrey, Dynamics of forward and reverse transport by the glial glycine transporter, glyt1b. 2005, Pubmed
Aubrey, The transporters GlyT2 and VIAAT cooperate to determine the vesicular glycinergic phenotype. 2007, Pubmed
Babu, Deletion of the amino acid transporter Slc6a14 suppresses tumour growth in spontaneous mouse models of breast cancer. 2015, Pubmed
Benito-Muñoz, Modification of a Putative Third Sodium Site in the Glycine Transporter GlyT2 Influences the Chloride Dependence of Substrate Transport. 2018, Pubmed
Bhutia, Glutamine transporters in mammalian cells and their functions in physiology and cancer. 2016, Pubmed
Boucher, Molecular insights into the physiology of the 'thin film' of airway surface liquid. 1999, Pubmed
Bröer, The solute carrier 6 family of transporters. 2012, Pubmed
Carland, Molecular Determinants for Substrate Interactions with the Glycine Transporter GlyT2. 2018, Pubmed
Chen, Absorptive transport of amino acids by the rat colon. 2020, Pubmed
Christensen, Role of amino acid transport and countertransport in nutrition and metabolism. 1990, Pubmed
Coothankandaswamy, Amino acid transporter SLC6A14 is a novel and effective drug target for pancreatic cancer. 2016, Pubmed
Corvol, Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies five modifier loci of lung disease severity in cystic fibrosis. 2015, Pubmed
Cowgill, The contribution of voltage clamp fluorometry to the understanding of channel and transporter mechanisms. 2019, Pubmed
Dereeper, Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. 2008, Pubmed
Eulenburg, GlyT1 determines the glycinergic phenotype of amacrine cells in the mouse retina. 2018, Pubmed
Ferreira, Co-agonists differentially tune GluN2B-NMDA receptor trafficking at hippocampal synapses. 2017, Pubmed
Forster, The voltage dependence of a cloned mammalian renal type II Na+/Pi cotransporter (NaPi-2). 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Galietta, An electrogenic amino acid transporter in the apical membrane of cultured human bronchial epithelial cells. 1998, Pubmed
Gomeza, Deletion of the mouse glycine transporter 2 results in a hyperekplexia phenotype and postnatal lethality. 2003, Pubmed
Grewer, Electrophysiological characterization of membrane transport proteins. 2013, Pubmed
Gupta, Upregulation of the amino acid transporter ATB0,+ (SLC6A14) in colorectal cancer and metastasis in humans. 2005, Pubmed
Hatanaka, Na+ - and Cl- -coupled active transport of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors via amino acid transport system B(0,+). 2001, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hatanaka, Transport of D-serine via the amino acid transporter ATB(0,+) expressed in the colon. 2002, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hatanaka, Transport of amino acid-based prodrugs by the Na+- and Cl(-) -coupled amino acid transporter ATB0,+ and expression of the transporter in tissues amenable for drug delivery. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hauf, GlyT1 encephalopathy: Characterization of presumably disease causing GlyT1 mutations. 2020, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hilgemann, GAT1 (GABA:Na+:Cl-) cotransport function. Database reconstruction with an alternating access model. 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hirata, Defective glycinergic synaptic transmission in zebrafish motility mutants. 2009, Pubmed
Hirsch, Regulation of Na+/glucose cotransporter expression by protein kinases in Xenopus laevis oocytes. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Johansson, The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. 2008, Pubmed
Karunakaran, Interaction of tryptophan derivatives with SLC6A14 (ATB0,+) reveals the potential of the transporter as a drug target for cancer chemotherapy. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Karunakaran, SLC6A14 (ATB0,+) protein, a highly concentrative and broad specific amino acid transporter, is a novel and effective drug target for treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. 2011, Pubmed
Kavanaugh, Mutation of an amino acid residue influencing potassium coupling in the glutamate transporter GLT-1 induces obligate exchange. 1997, Pubmed
Latorraca, Mechanism of Substrate Translocation in an Alternating Access Transporter. 2017, Pubmed
Le Bail, Identity of the NMDA receptor coagonist is synapse specific and developmentally regulated in the hippocampus. 2015, Pubmed
LeVine, The allosteric mechanism of substrate-specific transport in SLC6 is mediated by a volumetric sensor. 2019, Pubmed
Loo, Role of Cl- in electrogenic Na+-coupled cotransporters GAT1 and SGLT1. 2000, Pubmed , Xenbase
Loo, Relaxation kinetics of the Na+/glucose cotransporter. 1993, Pubmed , Xenbase
Loo, Conformational changes couple Na+ and glucose transport. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mager, Ion binding and permeation at the GABA transporter GAT1. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mager, Possible role of amino acids, peptides, and sugar transporter in protein removal and innate lung defense. 2003, Pubmed
Mager, Steady states, charge movements, and rates for a cloned GABA transporter expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 1993, Pubmed , Xenbase
Meinild, Elucidating conformational changes in the gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter-1. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Parent, Electrogenic properties of the cloned Na+/glucose cotransporter: II. A transport model under nonrapid equilibrium conditions. 1992, Pubmed
Penmatsa, X-ray structure of dopamine transporter elucidates antidepressant mechanism. 2013, Pubmed
Poyatos, The glycine transporter GLYT2 is a reliable marker for glycine-immunoreactive neurons. 1997, Pubmed
Rees, Mutations in the gene encoding GlyT2 (SLC6A5) define a presynaptic component of human startle disease. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Rousseau, The glycine transporter GlyT2 controls the dynamics of synaptic vesicle refilling in inhibitory spinal cord neurons. 2008, Pubmed
Roux, Neuronal and glial glycine transporters have different stoichiometries. 2000, Pubmed , Xenbase
Roux, The glial and the neuronal glycine transporters differ in their reactivity to sulfhydryl reagents. 2001, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ruffin, Update on SLC6A14 in lung and gastrointestinal physiology and physiopathology: focus on cystic fibrosis. 2020, Pubmed
Sacher, Presteady-state and steady-state kinetics and turnover rate of the mouse gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter (mGAT3). 2002, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sandle, Salt and water absorption in the human colon: a modern appraisal. 1998, Pubmed
Shahsavar, Structural insights into the inhibition of glycine reuptake. 2021, Pubmed
Sikder, The Na+/Cl--Coupled, Broad-Specific, Amino Acid Transporter SLC6A14 (ATB0,+): Emerging Roles in Multiple Diseases and Therapeutic Potential for Treatment and Diagnosis. 2017, Pubmed
Sikder, SLC6A14, a Na+/Cl--coupled amino acid transporter, functions as a tumor promoter in colon and is a target for Wnt signaling. 2020, Pubmed
Sipilä, Glycine transporter-1 controls nonsynaptic inhibitory actions of glycine receptors in the neonatal rat hippocampus. 2014, Pubmed
Sivaprakasam, SLC6A14 deficiency is linked to obesity, fatty liver, and metabolic syndrome but only under conditions of a high-fat diet. 2021, Pubmed
Sloan, Cloning and functional expression of a human Na(+) and Cl(-)-dependent neutral and cationic amino acid transporter B(0+). 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sloan, Expression of the amino acid transporter ATB 0+ in lung: possible role in luminal protein removal. 2003, Pubmed
Sniegowski, SLC6A14 and SLC38A5 Drive the Glutaminolysis and Serine-Glycine-One-Carbon Pathways in Cancer. 2021, Pubmed
Steeves, The glycine neurotransmitter transporter GLYT1 is an organic osmolyte transporter regulating cell volume in cleavage-stage embryos. 2003, Pubmed
Subramanian, Identification of a 3rd Na+ Binding Site of the Glycine Transporter, GlyT2. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sun, Multiple apical plasma membrane constituents are associated with susceptibility to meconium ileus in individuals with cystic fibrosis. 2012, Pubmed
Supplisson, Control of NMDA receptor activation by a glycine transporter co-expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Supplisson, Why glycine transporters have different stoichiometries. 2002, Pubmed
Suviolahti, The SLC6A14 gene shows evidence of association with obesity. 2003, Pubmed
Talbot, Segregation of Na/H exchanger-3 and Cl/HCO3 exchanger SLC26A3 (DRA) in rodent cecum and colon. 2010, Pubmed
Vandenberg, Molecular basis for substrate discrimination by glycine transporters. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Villalobos, Mechanisms for stimulation of rat anterior pituitary cells by arginine and other amino acids. 1997, Pubmed
Wadiche, Ion fluxes associated with excitatory amino acid transport. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wadiche, Kinetics of a human glutamate transporter. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
Willford, Evidence for a Revised Ion/Substrate Coupling Stoichiometry of GABA Transporters. 2015, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yamashita, Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of Na+/Cl--dependent neurotransmitter transporters. 2005, Pubmed
Zafra, Glycine transporters are differentially expressed among CNS cells. 1995, Pubmed
Zerangue, Flux coupling in a neuronal glutamate transporter. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Zhang, Chloride-dependent conformational changes in the GlyT1 glycine transporter. 2021, Pubmed