Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Front Genet
2021 Nov 25;12:787979. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.787979.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Gene Structure Analysis of Chemokines and Their Receptors in Allotetraploid Frog, Xenopus laevis.
Fukui A
,
Matsunami M
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Chemokines, relatively small secreted proteins, are involved in cell migration and function in various biological events, including immunity, morphogenesis, and disease. Due to their nature, chemokines tend to be a target of hijacking of immunity by virus and therefore show an exceptionally high mutation rate. Xenopus laevis is considered an excellent model to investigate the effect of whole-genome duplication for gene family evolution. Because its allotetraploidization occurred around 17-18 million years ago, ancestral subgenomes L and S were well conserved. Based on the gene model of human and diploid frog Xenopus tropicalis, we identified 52 chemokine genes and 26 chemokine receptors in X. laevis. The retention rate of the gene in the X. laevis L and S subgenomes was 96% (45/47) and 68% (32/47), respectively. We conducted molecular phylogenetic analysis and found clear orthologies in all receptor genes but not in the ligand genes, suggesting rapid divergences of the ligand. dN/dS calculation demonstrated that dN/dS ratio greater than one was observed in the four ligand genes, cxcl8b.1.S, cxcl18.S, ccl21.S, and xcl1.L, but nothing in receptor genes. These results revealed that the whole-genome duplication promotes diversification of chemokine ligands in X. laevis while conserving the genes necessary for homeostasis, suggesting that selective pressure also supports a rapid divergence of the chemokines in amphibians.
FIGURE 1. Genomic organization of Xenopus chemokines. Positions of chemokine genes (open triangles) and flanking genes (closed triangles) with direction are indicated in the order of Xenopus chromosome numbers. Chromosomes Abbreviations. HSA: H. sapiens (black lines); XTR: X. tropicalis (green lines); XLA_L and XLA_S: X. laevis L and S subgenome (red and blue lines), respectively. Sc is a scaffold number that is unbuilt in the chromosome assembly. The homologous relationship presented by connected lines was analyzed phylogenetically. The dotted line with N represents the genes unidentified with N-gap. Triangles drawn with dotted line show fossil genes (f).
FIGURE 2. Genomic organization of Xenopus chemokine receptors. Representation is the same as Figure 1.
FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree of chemokine ligands. The tree indicates 154 chemokine proteins, including 52 of X. laevis, 30 of X. tropicalis, 24 of G. Gallus, and 48 of H. sapiens genes. Chemokine names related to Xenopus represented on the arcs. Bootstrap values greater than 50% were indicated, and asterisks show values greater than 90%. The alignment of chemokine proteins was prepared using CLUSTAL omega. Maximum likelihood methods using full-length were performed with 1,000 bootstraps using JTT with Gamma-distributed model, and inference option was a nearest-neighbor interchange method on NJ tree.
FIGURE 4. Phylogenetic tree of chemokine receptors. The tree indicates 82 chemokine receptor proteins, including 26 of X. laevis, 17 of X. tropicalis, 17 of G. Gallus, and 22 of H. sapiens genes. Receptor names represented on the arcs. Bootstrap values greater than 50% were indicated, and asterisks show values greater than 90%. The alignment of the receptor proteins was prepared using clustal omega and trimmed manually as 297 peptides with gaps. Maximum likelihood methods were performed with 1,000 bootstraps using the JTT model with Gamma distribution and invariant sites and complete deletion of gaps/missing data and inference option was a nearest-neighbor interchange method on NJ tree.
FIGURE 5. Expression profiles during oogenesis and embryogenesis. Genes with a max TMP value of 5 or higher during oogenesis and embryogenesis are presented. Expression profiles for X. tropicalis were obtained from Tan et al. (2013). Unfortunately, cxcl8, cxcl13a, and ccl42c have no expression profile of X. tropicalis. The vertical axis shows the expression level (TPM), and the horizontal axis is the developmental stages of X. laevis, X. tropicalis indicated within parentheses. All TPM values are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Orthologous family names and results of transcriptome correlation analysis are indicated on the upper left of each graph. Symbols. Square: X. tropicalis (green); circle,: X. laevis L-clutch T (red); diamond: X. laevis L-clutch U (magenta); triangle: X. laevis S-clutch T (blue); reverse triangle: X. laevis S-clutch U (cyan). Note that the TPM value of X. tropicalis in cxcl12 was indicated one-fifth scale to increase the resolution (x5).
FIGURE 6. Expression profiles in adult tissues. log2 transformed TPM values in Clutch T and Clutch U [log2 (TPM+1)] of all chemokine ligand and receptor genes of brain, eye, lung, stomach, intestine, liver, pancreas, kidney, testis, ovary, heart, muscle, skin, and spleen are presented with heat maps. For each homeologous pair, transcriptome correlation groups are indicated on the right side of panels. In cases of the “inc.” group, their details are described with parentheses. If results from two clutches showed half-consistency, their common results are indicated (HC or SE). Singletons were presented in the separated panels. All TPM values are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
Abel,
The transmembrane CXC-chemokine ligand 16 is induced by IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha and shed by the activity of the disintegrin-like metalloproteinase ADAM10.
2004, Pubmed
Abel,
The transmembrane CXC-chemokine ligand 16 is induced by IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha and shed by the activity of the disintegrin-like metalloproteinase ADAM10.
2004,
Pubmed
Baba,
Identification of CCR6, the specific receptor for a novel lymphocyte-directed CC chemokine LARC.
1997,
Pubmed
Belperio,
CXC chemokines in angiogenesis.
2000,
Pubmed
Berthelot,
The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates.
2014,
Pubmed
Bianchi,
The Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 in Cell Proliferation and Tissue Regeneration.
2020,
Pubmed
Braun,
Xenopus laevis Stromal cell-derived factor 1: conservation of structure and function during vertebrate development.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Burns,
A novel chemokine receptor for SDF-1 and I-TAC involved in cell survival, cell adhesion, and tumor development.
2006,
Pubmed
Cho,
Chemokine receptors and neural function.
2002,
Pubmed
Cui,
Molecular cloning, expression and functional analysis of interleukin-8 (IL-8) in South African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis).
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
DeVries,
On the edge: the physiological and pathophysiological role of chemokines during inflammatory and immunological responses.
1999,
Pubmed
DeVries,
Defining the origins and evolution of the chemokine/chemokine receptor system.
2006,
Pubmed
Felsenstein,
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP.
1985,
Pubmed
Force,
Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.
1999,
Pubmed
Fukui,
SDF-1 alpha regulates mesendodermal cell migration during frog gastrulation.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Furman,
Divergent subgenome evolution after allopolyploidization in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Förster,
A putative chemokine receptor, BLR1, directs B cell migration to defined lymphoid organs and specific anatomic compartments of the spleen.
1996,
Pubmed
Förster,
CCR7 and its ligands: balancing immunity and tolerance.
2008,
Pubmed
Garlisi,
The assignment of chemokine-chemokine receptor pairs: TARC and MIP-1 beta are not ligands for human CC-chemokine receptor 8.
1999,
Pubmed
Garsmeur,
Two evolutionarily distinct classes of paleopolyploidy.
2014,
Pubmed
Gosling,
Cutting edge: identification of a novel chemokine receptor that binds dendritic cell- and T cell-active chemokines including ELC, SLC, and TECK.
2000,
Pubmed
Goto,
Characterization of CXC-type chemokine molecules in early Xenopus laevis development.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hattermann,
An infernal trio: the chemokine CXCL12 and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 in tumor biology.
2013,
Pubmed
Hellsten,
Accelerated gene evolution and subfunctionalization in the pseudotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hieshima,
Molecular cloning of a novel human CC chemokine liver and activation-regulated chemokine (LARC) expressed in liver. Chemotactic activity for lymphocytes and gene localization on chromosome 2.
1997,
Pubmed
Hieshima,
CCL28 has dual roles in mucosal immunity as a chemokine with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity.
2003,
Pubmed
Homey,
Cutting edge: the orphan chemokine receptor G protein-coupled receptor-2 (GPR-2, CCR10) binds the skin-associated chemokine CCL27 (CTACK/ALP/ILC).
2000,
Pubmed
Islam,
Identification of human CCR8 as a CCL18 receptor.
2013,
Pubmed
Koubourli,
Amphibian (Xenopus laevis) Interleukin-8 (CXCL8): A Perspective on the Evolutionary Divergence of Granulocyte Chemotaxis.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kumar,
A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution.
1998,
Pubmed
Kumar,
MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.
2018,
Pubmed
Lataillade,
Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)\CXCR4 couple plays multiple roles on haematopoietic progenitors at the border between the old cytokine and new chemokine worlds: survival, cell cycling and trafficking.
2004,
Pubmed
Leal,
The Role of Sdf-1α signaling in Xenopus laevis somite morphogenesis.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Matloubian,
A transmembrane CXC chemokine is a ligand for HIV-coreceptor Bonzo.
2000,
Pubmed
Matsuda,
A New Nomenclature of Xenopus laevis Chromosomes Based on the Phylogenetic Relationship to Silurana/Xenopus tropicalis.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Matti,
CCL20 is a novel ligand for the scavenging atypical chemokine receptor 4.
2020,
Pubmed
Michiue,
High variability of expression profiles of homeologous genes for Wnt, Hh, Notch, and Hippo signaling pathways in Xenopus laevis.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mishra,
Expression of xSDF-1α, xCXCR4, and xCXCR7 during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moepps,
Characterization of a Xenopus laevis CXC chemokine receptor 4: implications for hematopoietic cell development in the vertebrate embryo.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moser,
Chemokines: multiple levels of leukocyte migration control.
2004,
Pubmed
Murphy,
Viral exploitation and subversion of the immune system through chemokine mimicry.
2001,
Pubmed
Murray,
Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets.
2011,
Pubmed
Nomiyama,
A family tree of vertebrate chemokine receptors for a unified nomenclature.
2011,
Pubmed
Nomiyama,
Systematic classification of vertebrate chemokines based on conserved synteny and evolutionary history.
2013,
Pubmed
Ohtsubo,
GenomeMatcher: a graphical user interface for DNA sequence comparison.
2008,
Pubmed
Papp,
Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast.
2003,
Pubmed
Puchert,
The peculiarities of the SDF-1/CXCL12 system: in some cells, CXCR4 and CXCR7 sing solos, in others, they sing duets.
2014,
Pubmed
Ratajczak,
The pleiotropic effects of the SDF-1-CXCR4 axis in organogenesis, regeneration and tumorigenesis.
2006,
Pubmed
Ratajczak,
A novel perspective on stem cell homing and mobilization: review on bioactive lipids as potent chemoattractants and cationic peptides as underappreciated modulators of responsiveness to SDF-1 gradients.
2012,
Pubmed
Rossi,
The biology of chemokines and their receptors.
2000,
Pubmed
Saitou,
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
1987,
Pubmed
Sankoff,
A model for biased fractionation after whole genome duplication.
2012,
Pubmed
Schnable,
Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss.
2011,
Pubmed
Schweickart,
CCR11 is a functional receptor for the monocyte chemoattractant protein family of chemokines.
2000,
Pubmed
Session,
Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shellard,
Chemotaxis during neural crest migration.
2016,
Pubmed
Sievers,
Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega.
2011,
Pubmed
Strieter,
The functional role of the ELR motif in CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis.
1995,
Pubmed
Suzuki,
Genomic organization and modulation of gene expression of the TGF-β and FGF pathways in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Takeuchi,
Analysis of SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling in primordial germ cell migration and survival or differentiation in Xenopus laevis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tan,
RNA sequencing reveals a diverse and dynamic repertoire of the Xenopus tropicalis transcriptome over development.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tanegashima,
CXCL14 is a natural inhibitor of the CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling axis.
2013,
Pubmed
Tiffany,
Identification of CCR8: a human monocyte and thymus receptor for the CC chemokine I-309.
1997,
Pubmed
Van de Peer,
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications.
2009,
Pubmed
Watanabe,
Conservatism and variability of gene expression profiles among homeologous transcription factors in Xenopus laevis.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wedemeyer,
The chemokine X-factor: Structure-function analysis of the CXC motif at CXCR4 and ACKR3.
2020,
Pubmed
Yang,
PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.
2007,
Pubmed
Zhao,
RNA-Seq transcriptome reveals different molecular responses during human and mouse oocyte maturation and fertilization.
2020,
Pubmed
Zlotnik,
Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity.
2000,
Pubmed
Zlotnik,
The chemokine and chemokine receptor superfamilies and their molecular evolution.
2006,
Pubmed