Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
XB-ART-58306
Br J Pharmacol 2022 Feb 01;1793:473-486. doi: 10.1111/bph.15668.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Neonatal NaV 1.5 channels: pharmacological distinctiveness of a cancer-related voltage-gated sodium channel splice variant.

Fraser SP , Onkal R , Theys M , Bosmans F , Djamgoz MBA .


???displayArticle.abstract???
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Voltage-gated sodium (NaV ) channels are expressed de novo in carcinomas where their activity promotes invasiveness. Breast and colon cancer cells express the neonatal splice variant of NaV 1.5 (nNaV 1.5), which has several amino acid substitutions in the domain I voltage-sensor compared with its adult counterpart (aNaV 1.5). This study aimed to determine whether nNaV 1.5 channels could be distinguished pharmacologically from aNaV 1.5 channels. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Cells expressing either nNaV 1.5 or aNaV 1.5 channels were exposed to low MW inhibitors, an antibody or natural toxins, and changes in electrophysiological parameters were measured. Stable expression in EBNA cells and transient expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes were used. Currents were recorded by whole-cell patch clamp and two-electrode voltage-clamp, respectively. KEY RESULTS: Several clinically used blockers of NaV channels (lidocaine, procaine, phenytoin, mexiletine, ranolazine, and riluzole) could not distinguish between nNaV 1.5 or aNaV 1.5 channels. However, two tarantula toxins (HaTx and ProTx-II) and a polyclonal antibody (NESOpAb) preferentially inhibited currents elicited by either nNaV 1.5 or aNaV 1.5 channels by binding to the spliced region of the channel. Furthermore, the amino acid residue at position 211 (aspartate in aNaV 1.5/lysine in nNaV 1.5), that is, the charge reversal in the spliced region of the channel, played a key role in the selectivity, especially in antibody binding. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We conclude that the cancer-related nNaV 1.5 channel can be distinguished pharmacologically from its nearest neighbour, aNaV 1.5 channels. Thus, it may be possible to design low MW compounds as antimetastatic drugs for non-toxic therapy of nNaV 1.5-expressing carcinomas.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 34411279
???displayArticle.link??? Br J Pharmacol
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
GO keywords: voltage-gated sodium channel activity

???displayArticle.disOnts??? carcinoma