Vasseur L et al. (2019), Fluorescent analogues of BeKm-1 with high and s...

XB-ART-57099

Toxicon X 2019 Feb 23;2:100010. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2019.100010.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Fluorescent analogues of BeKm-1 with high and specific activity against the hERG channel.

Vasseur L , Chavanieu A , Combemale S , Caumes C , Béroud R , De Waard M , Ducrot P , Boutin JA , Ferry G , Cens T .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Peptidic toxins that target specifically mammalian channels and receptors can be found in the venom of animals. These toxins are rarely used directly as tools for biochemical experiments, and need to be modified via the attachment of chemical groups (e.g., radioactive or fluorescent moieties). Ideally, such modifications should maintain the toxin specificity and affinity for its target. With the goal of obtaining fluorescent derivatives of BeKm-1, a toxin from the scorpion species Buthus eupeus that selectively inhibits the voltage-gated potassium ion channel hERG, we produced four active analogues using a model of BeKm-1 docking to the outer mouth of the channel. In these BeKm-1 analogues, the natural peptide was linked to the fluorescent cyanine 5 (Cy5) probe via four different linkers at Arg1 or Arg/Lys27. All analogues retained their specificity towards the hERG channel in electrophysiological experiments but displayed a lesser affinity. These results validate our strategy for designing toxin analogues and demonstrate that different chemical groups can be attached to different residues of BeKm-1.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 32550567
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC7285999
???displayArticle.link??? Toxicon X

Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: arg1 arnt kcnh2

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

	Fig. 1. Docking of BeKm-1 in a model of hERG channel and fluorescent BeKm-1 analogues used in this study. A) Left, BeKm-1 (pdb code: 1j5, magenta, top) in interaction with hERG channel (in solid ribbon representation showing the solvent surface colored by hydrophobicity). The tetrameric model of the hERG channel was generated from the pdb structure (5VA1) using the Prepare Protein module within Discovery Studio. The transmembrane domain, the cytoplasmic N-terminal Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domain, the C-terminal C-linker and the cyclic nucleotide binding domain (CNBD) are indicated. Docking of BeKm-1 was performed using the ZDOCK rigid body docking program and refined with the RDOCK module. The top ranked pose of the most populated cluster from the protein-protein interaction predictions is showed with BeKm-1 docked at the top of the transmembrane domain of hERG. Right, Details of the pose of BeKm-1 (magenta) within the interaction surface of hERG colored according to the Solvent Accessibility Surface (SAS) (see Supplementary Data S2), with the side chain of the N terminal Arg1 and Arg27 (red) and the more buried C terminal Phe36 (orange). B) Chemical structures of fluorescent BeKm-1 analogues used in this study with different types of linkers grafted on the N-ter of Arg1 or the side chain of Arg27 mutated for a Lysine. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
	Fig. 2. The fluorescent BeKm-1 analogues potently inhibit hERG currents. A) Typical traces of currents recorded in Xenopus laevis oocytes that express hERG. Currents were elicited using the protocol depicted at the top in which a pulse from a holding potential of −80 mV to −30 mV precedes a test pulse at −50 mV, in the presence of increasing concentrations of native BeKm-1, Cy5-PEG3-linker4-BeKm-1, Cy5-spacerGS-linker6-BeKm-1, Cy5-PEG5-linker10-BeKm-1 or Cy5-PEG5-BeKm1-Lys27. Scale bars, 200 nA. B) Inhibition curves of native BeKm-1 and its four analogues. The peak current amplitude was measured during the test pulse at −50 mV in the presence of toxin (ITx) and normalized to the current recorded in the absence of toxin (ICt). Data are the mean ± SEM of n = 4–10 oocytes.
	Fig. 3. The fluorescent BeKm-1 analogues do not affect hKv10.1 and hKv1.3 currents. A) Typical traces of currents elicited by a step depolarization to 0 mV or 70 mV, from a holding potential of −80 mV, obtained from Xenopus laevis oocytes that express hKv10.1 or hKv1.3, respectively, in the absence or presence of 200 nM native BeKm-1 and in the absence or presence of 500 nM of Cy5-PEG3-linker4-BeKm-1, of Cy5-spacerGS-linker6-BeKm-1, of Cy5-PEG5-linker10-BeKm-1 and of Cy5-PEG5-BeKm1-Lys27. Note the lack of effect of BeKm-1 and of the four analogues on both channels. B) Percentage of current remaining in the presence of a single dose of native BeKm-1 or its four analogues (Cy5-PEG3-linker4-BeKm-1, Cy5-spacerGS-linker6-BeKm-1, Cy5-PEG5-linker10-BeKm-1 and Cy5-PEG5-BeKm1-Lys27). Current amplitude was measured before (ICt) and during (Itx) the perfusion of the different toxins. Data are the mean ± SEM of n = 4–7 oocytes.
	Fig. 4. The mutation S631C in hERG decreases the affinity of native BeKm-1 and of its four fluorescent analogues for the channel. Comparison of the inhibition curves of native BeKm-1 and its four analogues Cy5-PEG3-linker4-BeKm-1, Cy5-spacerGS-linker6-BeKm-1, Cy5-PEG5-linker10-BeKm-1 and Cy5-PEG5-BeKm1-Lys27 obtained in Xenopus laevis oocytes that express wild type (WT) hERG or the mutant S631C. The data obtained with the mutant channel were fitted by hand for the purpose of comparison. Data are the mean ± SEM of n = 3–5 oocytes.

References [+] :

Angelo, A radiolabeled peptide ligand of the hERG channel, [125I]-BeKm-1. 2003, Pubmed