Iwase S , Sato R , De Bock PJ , Gevaert K , Fujiki S , Tawada T , Kuchitsu M , Yamagishi Y , Ono S , Abe H .

R01 AR48615 NIAMS NIH HHS , R01 AR048615 NIAMS NIH HHS

	FIGURE 1:. Phosphorylation states of XAC and XSSH during oocyte maturation. (A) Phosphorylation states of XAC as determined by 2D immunoblots in immature oocytes (a) and mature (Meta II) oocytes (b). Unphosphorylated and phosphorylated forms of XAC are indicated by XAC and pXAC, respectively. Relative amounts of XAC and pXAC were determined by densitometry and are indicated on top of each blot. (B) Time course of changes in phosphorylation levels of XAC during oocyte maturation. Left, three examples of 2D immunoblots of XAC at relative time points as indicated in the graph on the right. The spots of XAC and pXAC at different time points during oocyte maturation were quantified by densitometry, and percentages of pXAC are shown. Time 0 is at the addition of progesterone, and time 1.0 is when >80% of oocytes show WMS. GVBD represents the oocytes in which GVBD just occurred. M II represents the data from fully mature oocytes. (C) Phosphorylation states of XSSH during oocyte maturation as determined by mobility shifts in immunoblot. Top, immunoblots of XSSH in immature (oocyte) and mature (Meta II) oocytes. XSSH in mature oocyte were detected as bands with slower mobility than those of XSSH in immature oocytes. The retarded mobility was canceled by alkaline phosphatase treatment (Meta II + AP), indicating that the mobility shifts were due to phosphorylation. The bands of pXSSH were split into two groups. Bottom, immunoblots of XSSH at different time points during oocyte maturation. Phosphorylation of XSSH as shown by mobility shifts was enhanced at GVBD.
	FIGURE 2:. Identification of phosphorylation sites of XSSH and binding properties of XSSH to 14-3-3ζ. (A) Domain organization of XSSH and structures of truncated mutants used in this study. SSH a and SSH b, Slingshot-homology domains A and B, respectively; DSPc, a dual-specific phosphatase domain; Tail, Slingshot tail domain. (B, C) Phosphorylation of XSSH and the mutants with CSF extracts. (a–a′′′) treatments with buffer alone, (b–b′′′) treatments with CSF extracts, and (c–c′′′) treatments with CSF extracts followed by alkaline phosphatase treatments. Arrowheads represent shifted bands due to phosphorylation, and arrows indicate the dephosphorylated forms after alkaline phosphatase treatments. Because samples were probed with the anti-GST antibody, degradation products were also detected. Phosphorylation of the degraded GST–N-tail was also detected, as shown by a bracket in C. (D) In vitro phosphorylation of GST–N-tail was performed in buffer alone (control), meiotic extracts (CSF), interphase extracts (interphase), or mitotic extracts (ΔN cyclin) and subjected to immunoblot with anti-GST antibody. In the two right lanes, GST–N-tail was reacted with CSF extracts (CSF) or CSF extracts with 1 μM okadaic acid (CSF+OKA). Arrowhead indicates the position of phosphorylated bands, and an arrow indicates the position of additionally shifted bands in the presence of okadaic acid. (E) Phosphorylation sites in the N-tail region. The yellow boxes indicate phosphorylated residues identified by MS. P1–P5 represent residues examined by site-directed mutagenesis. The underlining at the P4 site indicates the consensus sequence for PKD1 phosphorylation sites. (F) GST–N-tail (pGST–N-tail) and its variants with indicated mutations (P1,3 to P1,2,3,4,5) were phosphorylated in vitro in CSF extracts and subjected to immunoblot with anti-GST antibody. Unphosphorylated GST–N-tail was loaded on the right lane. Arrow and arrowhead indicate nonphosphorylated and fully phosphorylated GST–N-tail, respectively. (G) Pull-down assay of 14-3-3ζ with GST-tail mutants. 14-3-3ζ bound to GST-tail (left) and GST-C-tail (right) before and after phosphorylation but did not bind to GST-N-tail (right). Top right, immunoblots with anti-GST antibody of nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated GST-tail mutants bound to glutathione beads. GST alone was used as control. Arrowheads indicate phosphorylated GST–N-tail and GST-C-tail. Bottom right, coprecipitated 14-3-3ζ probed with anti–14-3-3 antibody.
	FIGURE 3:. Effects of phosphorylation of XSSH on its phosphatase activity (A, D) and F-actin–binding ability (B, C) in vitro. (A) Time course of dephosphorylation of 10 μM pXAC by 0.2 μM XSSH in the absence of F-actin (control), 0.2 μM XSSH in the presence of 4.2 μM F-actin (XSSH), or 0.2 μM pXSSH in the presence of 4.2 μM F-actin (pXSSH). Dephosphorylation of pXAC was monitored by immunoblots using anti–phospho-ADF/cofilin antibody (top left, three). The results were quantified by densitometry and are shown as relative band intensity in the graph (1.0 at time 0). Bottom left two, time course of dephosphorylation of pXAC under the same conditions as described except for the presence of 4.7 μM chicken cofilin with 4.2 μM F-actin (XSSH+cof and pXSSH+cof). (B) Pelleting assay of XSSH (top) and pXSSH (bottom) with 4.7 μM F-actin by altering the concentrations of XSSH or pXSSH as indicated. Supernatants (s) and pellets (p) were examined by SDS–PAGE and Coomassie staining. The graph shows concentration of XSSHs in pellets vs. that of added XSSHs. The data from three independent experiments are plotted. (C) Pelleting assay of 1 μM XSSH or pXSSH with 4.7 μM F-actin in the presence (+cofilin) or absence (–) of 4.7 μM chick cofilin.
	FIGURE 4:. Effects of F-actin levels on the XAC phosphatase activity of XSSH. (A) Phosphorylation states of XAC were examined by 2D immunoblots of XAC in immature oocytes (oocyte) and maturing oocytes just after GVBD, which were treated with jasplakinolide (jas) or latrunculin B (lat B). Control indicates the treatment with vehicle alone. (B) Phosphorylation states of XAC were examined by 2D immunoblots of XAC in CSF extracts in the presence of jas or lat B. Control indicates addition of vehicle alone. (C) Phosphorylation states of XAC were examined by 2D immunoblots of XAC in mock-depleted CSF extracts (mock) or XSSH-depleted CSF extracts (ΔXSSH) in the absence (control) or presence of jas or lat B. XSSH was sufficiently depleted from CSF extracts (front row, XSSH) as judged by the anti-actin blots (second row, actin). The spots of XAC and pXAC were quantified by densitometry, and percentages of pXAC are shown. (D) Immature oocytes (top) and maturing oocytes just after GVBD (bottom) treated with vehicle alone (control), lat B, or jas were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min (low speed), and the supernatants were further ultracentrifuged at 436,000 × g for 20 min (high speed) to separate the supernatants and pellets. The supernatants (s) and pellets (p) were subjected to SDS–PAGE and examined by immunoblotting with anti-XSSH or anti-actin antibody. (E) Immunoblots of XSSH and actin in high-speed supernatants (s) and pellets (p) of CSF extracts treated with vehicle alone (control), 25 μM lat B, 10 μM jas, or 10 μM phalloidin (pha) as described in D. (F) The XSSH bands in high-speed supernatants and precipitates (ppt) were quantified by densitometry, and percentages of precipitated XSSH are shown. Bars, mean + SE from three independent experiments using immature oocytes (oocyte), mature oocytes (Meta II), and CSF extracts in the absence (control) or presence of latrunculin B (+latB) or jasplakinolide (+jas).
	FIGURE 5:. Effects of the anti-XSSH antibody on the XSSH activity in vitro and the phosphorylation states of XSSH and XAC in maturing oocytes. (A) Xenopus oocytes were injected with buffer alone (control), anti-XSSH, anti-XSSH plus constitutively active cofilin (S3A-cof), anti-XSSH plus phosphomimetic inactive cofilin (S3D-cof), or anti-XSSH plus wild-type cofilin (WT-cof). The concentrations of anti-XSSH IgG and cofilins were 8 and 0.5 mg/ml, respectively. After progesterone treatment, WMS formation (indicated by arrowheads) was examined. A typical example of injection experiments is summarized in the graph. ab, anti-XSSH antibody injection. (B) Effect of the anti-XSSH antibody on the XAC phosphatase activity of XSSH was examined by incubating pXAC (left lane) with combinations of 4.7 μM F-actin, 0.3 μM XSSH, and 1 mg/ml antibody as indicated, followed by immunoblot with anti–phospho-ADF/cofilin antibody. pXAC was dephosphorylated in the presence of F-actin and XSSH, and addition of anti-XSSH antibody did not inhibit dephosphorylation. Actin alone, antibody alone, XSSH alone, or actin and the antibody without XSSH did not alter pXAC dephosphorylation. The anti-XSSH antibody did not activate XSSH in the absence of F-actin. (C) Effects of anti-XSSH antibody on phosphorylation of XSSH in oocytes. Oocytes were injected with buffer alone (control; three samples) or anti-XSSH antibody (three samples) and examined at 3 h after GVBD by immunoblot with anti-XSSH antibody. Right, three samples of untreated immature oocytes as controls to determine mobility of nonphosphorylated XSSH. Injection of anti-XSSH antibody partially inhibited full phosphorylation of XSSH during oocyte maturation. (D) Binding of the anti-XSSH antibody to XSSH in mature oocytes. Control and antibody-injected oocytes were homogenized with PBS and centrifuged (at low speed). The supernatants were subjected to SDS–PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-XSSH antibody. Three control and six antibody-injected samples are shown. (E) Effects of the anti-XSSH antibody on the phosphorylation states of XAC during oocyte maturation. Oocytes were injected with buffer alone (control), anti-XSSH antibody, or anti-XSSH antibody and S3A-cofilin and examined by 2D immunoblot with anti-XAC antibody, when >80% of control oocytes show WMS.
	FIGURE 6:. Effects of injection of anti-XSSH antibody on assembly of MTOC-TMA and meiotic spindles. (A, B) Phase contrast (left) and immunofluorescence (right) microscopy of control oocytes injected with buffer alone (A) or oocytes injected with anti-XSSH antibody (B). Microtubules were stained with anti-tubulin antibody (right). Assembly of MTOC-TMA (arrowhead in A, top right) at the basal region of GV and its migration toward the animal pole (arrowhead in A, bottom right) are clearly visible in control (A), whereas its structure is faint in antibody-injected oocytes (arrowheads in B, top right). The yolk-free region formed at the basal region of GV (indicated by arrows in phase contrast micrographs) showed broader and irregular shape in anti-XSSH antibody-injected oocytes (B). (C, D) Phase contrast images (left) and immunofluorescence staining for tubulin (right) of control oocytes 4 h after GVBD (C) and antibody-injected oocytes fixed at 4 h after control oocytes formed WMS (D). Meiotic spindles were already assembled in control oocytes (C, magnified in inset), whereas fine and radial microtubule structures were formed (D, left, magnified) and scattered around the yolk-free region in antibody-injected oocytes (D, arrow). (E) A jasplakinolide-treated oocyte was fixed at 4 h after control oocytes formed WMS and stained with anti-tubulin antibody. An example of radial microtubule structures is shown in the inset on the upper right corner. (F) Staining of control (top) and jasplakinolide-treated (bottom) oocytes for actin filaments by anti-actin antibody. Note the cortical accumulation of actin filaments by jasplakinolide treatment. Bars, (A, B) 100 μm, (C, applies to C– F) 200 μm, (insets) 20 μm.

Abe, Xenopus laevis actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin: a phosphorylation-regulated protein essential for development. 1996, Pubmed, Xenbase

Abe, Xenopus laevis actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin: a phosphorylation-regulated protein essential for development. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Arber, Regulation of actin dynamics through phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase. 1998, Pubmed
Azoury, Symmetry breaking in mouse oocytes requires transient F-actin meshwork destabilization. 2011, Pubmed
Azoury, Spindle positioning in mouse oocytes relies on a dynamic meshwork of actin filaments. 2008, Pubmed
Barišić, Phosphorylation of Ser 402 impedes phosphatase activity of slingshot 1. 2011, Pubmed
Becker, XMAP215, XKCM1, NuMA, and cytoplasmic dynein are required for the assembly and organization of the transient microtubule array during the maturation of Xenopus oocytes. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Bernstein, ADF/cofilin: a functional node in cell biology. 2010, Pubmed
Bohnsack, A selective block of nuclear actin export stabilizes the giant nuclei of Xenopus oocytes. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Calarco, The role of microfilaments in early meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. 2005, Pubmed
Dahlgaard, Capu and Spire assemble a cytoplasmic actin mesh that maintains microtubule organization in the Drosophila oocyte. 2007, Pubmed
Deng, The Ran GTPase mediates chromatin signaling to control cortical polarity during polar body extrusion in mouse oocytes. 2007, Pubmed
Deng, Sperm chromatin-induced ectopic polar body extrusion in mouse eggs after ICSI and delayed egg activation. 2009, Pubmed
Dorée, From Cdc2 to Cdk1: when did the cell cycle kinase join its cyclin partner? 2002, Pubmed
Eiseler, Protein kinase D1 regulates cofilin-mediated F-actin reorganization and cell motility through slingshot. 2009, Pubmed
Field, Bulk cytoplasmic actin and its functions in meiosis and mitosis. 2011, Pubmed
Gard, Microtubule organization during maturation of Xenopus oocytes: assembly and rotation of the meiotic spindles. 1992, Pubmed , Xenbase
Gard, F-actin is required for spindle anchoring and rotation in Xenopus oocytes: a re-examination of the effects of cytochalasin B on oocyte maturation. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ghesquière, In vitro and in vivo protein-bound tyrosine nitration characterized by diagonal chromatography. 2009, Pubmed
Glotzer, Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. 1991, Pubmed , Xenbase
Helsens, ms_lims, a simple yet powerful open source laboratory information management system for MS-driven proteomics. 2010, Pubmed
Iida, Reversible induction of actin rods in mouse C3H-2K cells by incubation in salt buffers and by treatment with non-ionic detergents. 1986, Pubmed
Jessus, Distribution of microtubules during the breakdown of the nuclear envelope of the Xenopus oocyte: an immunocytochemical study. 1986, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kligys, The slingshot family of phosphatases mediates Rac1 regulation of cofilin phosphorylation, laminin-332 organization, and motility behavior of keratinocytes. 2007, Pubmed
Laemmli, Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. 1970, Pubmed
Liu, Hypertonicity-induced projections reflect cell polarity in mouse metaphase II oocytes: involvement of microtubules, microfilaments, and chromosomes. 2002, Pubmed
Lohka, Purification of maturation-promoting factor, an intracellular regulator of early mitotic events. 1988, Pubmed , Xenbase
Longo, Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: involvement of the meiotic apparatus. 1985, Pubmed
Lénárt, A contractile nuclear actin network drives chromosome congression in oocytes. 2005, Pubmed
Margalit, Breaking and making of the nuclear envelope. 2005, Pubmed
Masui, Cytoplasmic control of nuclear behavior during meiotic maturation of frog oocytes. 1971, Pubmed
Masui, Oocyte maturation. 1979, Pubmed
Meberg, Actin depolymerizing factor and cofilin phosphorylation dynamics: response to signals that regulate neurite extension. 1998, Pubmed
Miyamoto, Nuclear actin polymerization is required for transcriptional reprogramming of Oct4 by oocytes. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mori, Intracellular transport by an anchored homogeneously contracting F-actin meshwork. 2011, Pubmed
Murray, Cell cycle extracts. 1991, Pubmed
Nagaoka, Effects of cofilin on actin filamentous structures in cultured muscle cells. Intracellular regulation of cofilin action. 1995, Pubmed
Nagaoka, Site-directed mutagenesis of the phosphorylation site of cofilin: its role in cofilin-actin interaction and cytoplasmic localization. 1996, Pubmed
Nagata-Ohashi, A pathway of neuregulin-induced activation of cofilin-phosphatase Slingshot and cofilin in lamellipodia. 2004, Pubmed
Niwa, Control of actin reorganization by Slingshot, a family of phosphatases that dephosphorylate ADF/cofilin. 2002, Pubmed
O'Farrell, High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteins. 1977, Pubmed
Okada, XAIP1: a Xenopus homologue of yeast actin interacting protein 1 (AIP1), which induces disassembly of actin filaments cooperatively with ADF/cofilin family proteins. 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
Okada, Stabilization of actin filaments prevents germinal vesicle breakdown and affects microtubule organization in Xenopus oocytes. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ono, Mechanism of depolymerization and severing of actin filaments and its significance in cytoskeletal dynamics. 2007, Pubmed
Pfender, Spire-type actin nucleators cooperate with Formin-2 to drive asymmetric oocyte division. 2011, Pubmed
Pollard, Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. 2009, Pubmed
Prodon, Cortical and cytoplasmic flows driven by actin microfilaments polarize the cortical ER-mRNA domain along the a-v axis in ascidian oocytes. 2008, Pubmed
Prodon, Actin microfilaments guide the polarized transport of nuclear pore complexes and the cytoplasmic dispersal of Vasa mRNA during GVBD in the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. 2009, Pubmed
Rosenblatt, Xenopus actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin (XAC) is responsible for the turnover of actin filaments in Listeria monocytogenes tails. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ryabova, Influence of cytochalasin B on oocyte maturation in Xenopus laevis. 1986, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sandquist, And the dead shall rise: actin and myosin return to the spindle. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Schuh, A new model for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes. 2008, Pubmed
Soosairajah, Interplay between components of a novel LIM kinase-slingshot phosphatase complex regulates cofilin. 2005, Pubmed
Spudich, The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. 1971, Pubmed
Sun, Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Takahashi, Functional involvement of Xenopus LIM kinases in progression of oocyte maturation. 2001, Pubmed , Xenbase
Tanaka, Functional involvement of Xenopus homologue of ADF/cofilin phosphatase, slingshot (XSSH), in the gastrulation movement. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Tanaka, Involvement of slingshot in the Rho-mediated dephosphorylation of ADF/cofilin during Xenopus cleavage. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Towbin, Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. 1979, Pubmed
Van Troys, Ins and outs of ADF/cofilin activity and regulation. 2008, Pubmed
Verlhac, Spindle positioning: going against the actin flow. 2011, Pubmed
Verlhac, Asymmetric division in mouse oocytes: with or without Mos. 2000, Pubmed
Weber, A microtubule-binding myosin required for nuclear anchoring and spindle assembly. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wessel, A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. 1984, Pubmed
Yang, Cofilin phosphorylation by LIM-kinase 1 and its role in Rac-mediated actin reorganization. 1998, Pubmed
Yi, Dynamic maintenance of asymmetric meiotic spindle position through Arp2/3-complex-driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes. 2011, Pubmed