Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Transcriptomic analysis of avian digits reveals conserved and derived digit identities in birds.
Wang Z
,
Young RL
,
Xue H
,
Wagner GP
.
Abstract
Morphological characters are the result of developmental gene expression. The identity of a character is ultimately grounded in the gene regulatory network directing development and thus whole-genome gene expression data can provide evidence about character identity. This approach has been successfully used to assess cell-type identity. Here we use transcriptomic data to address a long-standing uncertainty in evolutionary biology, the identity of avian wing digits. Embryological evidence clearly identifies the three wing digits as developing from digit positions 2, 3 and 4 (ref. 6), whereas palaeontological data suggest that they are digits I, II and III. We compare the transcriptomes of the wing and foot digits and find a strong signal that unites the first wing digit with the first footdigit, even though the first wing digit develops from embryological position 2. Interestingly, our transcriptomic data of the posterior digits show a higher degree of differentiation among forelimb digits compared with hindlimb digits. These data show that in the stem lineage of birds the first digit underwent a translocation from digit position 1 to position 2, and further indicate that the posterior wing digits have unique identities contrary to any model of avian digit identity proposed so far.
Abellán,
Olfactory and amygdalar structures of the chicken ventral pallium based on the combinatorial expression patterns of LIM and other developmental regulatory genes.
2009, Pubmed
Abellán,
Olfactory and amygdalar structures of the chicken ventral pallium based on the combinatorial expression patterns of LIM and other developmental regulatory genes.
2009,
Pubmed
Alizadeh,
Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling.
2000,
Pubmed
Arendt,
The evolution of cell types in animals: emerging principles from molecular studies.
2008,
Pubmed
Averof,
Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans.
1995,
Pubmed
Burke,
Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Cherbas,
The transcriptional diversity of 25 Drosophila cell lines.
2011,
Pubmed
Dahn,
Interdigital regulation of digit identity and homeotic transformation by modulated BMP signaling.
2000,
Pubmed
Firulli,
Altered Twist1 and Hand2 dimerization is associated with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome and limb abnormalities.
2005,
Pubmed
HAMBURGER,
A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.
1951,
Pubmed
Hargrave,
In situ hybridization of whole-mount embryos.
2006,
Pubmed
Mansfield,
Hox expression in the American alligator and evolution of archosaurian axial patterning.
2010,
Pubmed
McMahon,
Expression of the zic1, zic2, zic3, and zic4 genes in early chick embryos.
2010,
Pubmed
Montavon,
Modeling Hox gene regulation in digits: reverse collinearity and the molecular origin of thumbness.
2008,
Pubmed
Nelson,
Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud.
1996,
Pubmed
Novershtern,
Densely interconnected transcriptional circuits control cell states in human hematopoiesis.
2011,
Pubmed
Palmer,
Cell-type specific gene expression profiles of leukocytes in human peripheral blood.
2006,
Pubmed
Robinson,
edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.
2009,
Pubmed
Robinson,
A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.
2010,
Pubmed
Sugino,
Molecular taxonomy of major neuronal classes in the adult mouse forebrain.
2005,
Pubmed
Suzuki,
Unique SMAD1/5/8 activity at the phalanx-forming region determines digit identity.
2008,
Pubmed
Suzuki,
Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering.
2006,
Pubmed
Tamura,
Embryological evidence identifies wing digits in birds as digits 1, 2, and 3.
2011,
Pubmed
Tickle,
Making digit patterns in the vertebrate limb.
2006,
Pubmed
Tzchori,
LIM homeobox transcription factors integrate signaling events that control three-dimensional limb patterning and growth.
2009,
Pubmed
Uejima,
Anterior shift in gene expression precedes anteriormost digit formation in amniote limbs.
2010,
Pubmed
Vargas,
Birds have dinosaur wings: The molecular evidence.
2005,
Pubmed
Vargas,
The evolution of HoxD-11 expression in the bird wing: insights from Alligator mississippiensis.
2008,
Pubmed
Wagner,
The developmental genetics of homology.
2007,
Pubmed
Wagner,
1,2,3 = 2,3,4: a solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand.
1999,
Pubmed
Wagner,
The developmental evolution of avian digit homology: an update.
2006,
Pubmed
Wang,
DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data.
2009,
Pubmed
Welten,
Gene expression and digit homology in the chicken embryo wing.
2005,
Pubmed
Young,
Identity of the avian wing digits: problems resolved and unsolved.
2011,
Pubmed
Young,
Why ontogenetic homology criteria can be misleading: lessons from digit identity transformations.
2011,
Pubmed
Young,
Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias.
2010,
Pubmed
Zhu,
Characterization of the interactions of human ZIC3 mutants with GLI3.
2007,
Pubmed
