Peyrot SM et al. (2010), Lymph heart musculature is under distinct devel...

XB-ART-40925

Dev Biol 2010 Mar 15;3392:429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.01.002.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Lymph heart musculature is under distinct developmental control from lymphatic endothelium.

Peyrot SM , Martin BL , Harland RM .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Lymph hearts are pulsatile organs, present in lower vertebrates, that function to propel lymph into the venous system. Although they are absent in mammals, the initial veno-lymphatic plexus that forms during mammalian jugular lymph sac development has been described as the vestigial homologue of the nascent stage of ancestral anterior lymph hearts. Despite the widespread presence of lymph hearts among vertebrate species and their unique function, extremely little is known about lymph heart development. We show that Xenopus anterior lymph heart muscle expresses skeletal muscle markers such as myoD and 12/101, rather than cardiac markers. The onset of lymph heart myoblast induction can be visualized by engrailed-1 (en1) staining in anterior trunk somites, which is dependent on Hedgehog (Hh) signaling. In the absence of Hh signaling and upon en1 knockdown, lymph heart muscle fails to develop, despite the normal development of the lymphatic endothelium of the lymph heart, and embryos develop edema. These results suggest a mechanism for the evolutionary transition from anterior lymph hearts to jugular lymph sacs in mammals.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 20067786
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC2845526
???displayArticle.link??? Dev Biol
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: actc1 actl6a en1 gata4 myod1 prox1 sacs shh tnni3
???displayArticle.morpholinos??? en1 MO1 en1 MO2

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

	Fig. 1. Lymph heart myoblasts express skeletal muscle markers and not cardiac markers. The 12/101 antibody marks lymph hearts in stage 42 tadpoles (A, C, and M) and MyoD is expressed in differentiating lymph hearts at stage 40 (B, arrows). Two bilaterally symmetrical lymph hearts can be seen adjacent to the somites (A, B, arrows). The lymph heart forms in a region adjacent to somites 3 and 4 (C, K, trunk somites are numbered). Lymph heart muscle consists of a meshwork of myotubes (C). The lymph heart does not express cardiac markers GATA4 (D, E), cardiac troponin (F, G), or cardiac actin (H, I) at st. 33/34 (D, F, and H) or st. 40 (E, G, and I), except for cardiac actin at st. 40 (I, arrow), which marks all immature muscle (note expression in paraxial and head mesoderm in H, I). Rhodamine-dextran (mini-Ruby) injected subcutaneously into the posterior ventral tail fin drains anteriorly into the kidney (J, bright spot with asterisk) and into the lymph heart through vessels (J, arrowhead). The labeled lymph heart is located between somites 3 and 4 (K). Embryos injected with rhodamine-dextran (L, red) and then stained for the skeletal muscle antibody 12/101 (M, green) show co-expression (M', yellow). All lateral views, anterior left, except for (A, B), which are dorsal views.
	Fig. 2. en1 and prox1 label the developing lymph heart musculature and endothelial tissue, respectively. The expression of en1 is localized to the mid-hindbrain boundary, spinal interneurons, and anterior somites. The onset of somitic expression occurs at stage 28 (A) in a superficial region on a horizontal plane with the notochord (E, arrowhead, middle of notochord indicated by red line). The expression does not overlap with 12/101 staining in the differentiated muscle (green). Lateral views show early expression in the anterior somites (A–B, arrowheads), which intensifies and moves ventrally to occupy the final position of the lymph heart (C–D, G). A transverse section of a stage 33 tadpole (F) shows the intensity of expression increasing. By stage 37 (G), en1-positive cells have moved ventrally relative to the position of the notochord (red line) and are found directly above the glomus (arrow) and pronephric tubules (arrowhead). At stage 40, prox1 RNA (blue, H, J, and L) and Prox1 protein (brown, I, K, and M) are localized to the developing endothelial tissue of the lymph heart (H, I, arrows). (J, K) Higher magnification views of H and I illustrate the budding lymphatic vasculature dorsal to the lymph heart (arrowheads). (L) The expression of prox1 is slightly ventral to the notochord (red line) and dorsal to the pronephron (arrow) and does not overlap with differentiated muscle (12/101, green). (M) Prox1 (brown) and en1 (blue) expressing cells co-localize at the site of lymph heart formation (arrow). The epidermis has sloughed off during the processing of this embryo.
	Fig. 3. Lymph heart muscle but not lymphatic endothelium requires Hh signaling. Cyclopamine treatment greatly reduces en1 expression in the somites (23 out of 24 embryos), while neural expression is relatively unaffected (B compared to A, arrow in A indicates lymph heart expression). At later stages, 12/101 staining shows that lymph heart musculature is missing in cyclopamine-treated tadpoles (D compared to C, arrow in C indicates lymph heart muscle). The presence of Prox1-positive lymphatic endothelial cells (arrowheads) is not affected by cyclopamine treatment at stage 39 (F compared to E) or stage 42 (H compared to G). (H) The loss of lymph heart musculature leads to a less compact distribution of Prox1-positive cells in the lymph heart (arrow).
	Fig. 7. Engrailed-1 is required for lymph heart myogenesis. Two non-overlapping MOs were designed to block en1 translation. Bilateral injection of En1 MO leads to loss of lymph heart beat and edema (A–C). Unilateral injection of En1 MO leads to specific loss of lymph heart musculature assayed by en1 expression (D–F, p < 0.05 χ2 test) and 12/101 staining (G–I, dorsal view, arrow points to lymph heart, asterisk indicates injected side). In controls, 100% of embryos have two 12/101-positive lymph hearts (N = 43), while 5% of En1 morphants do (En1 MO1 N = 42, En1 MO2 N = 38). Lymph heart endothelium (prox1, J–L) is not affected by En1 knockdown compared to controls (p > 0.05, χ2 test).

References [+] :

Cheng, The epaxial-hypaxial subdivision of the avian somite. 2004, Pubmed