Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
BMC Dev Biol
2008 May 28;8:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-8-58.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Control over the morphology and segregation of Zebrafish germ cell granules during embryonic development.
Strasser MJ
,
Mackenzie NC
,
Dumstrei K
,
Nakkrasae LI
,
Stebler J
,
Raz E
.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zebrafish germ cells contain granular-like structures, organized around the cell nucleus. These structures share common features with polar granules in Drosophila, germinal granules in Xenopus and chromatoid bodies in mice germ cells, such as the localization of the zebrafish Vasa, Piwi and Nanos proteins, among others. Little is known about the structure of these granules as well as their segregation in mitosis during early germ-cell development.
RESULTS: Using transgenic fish expressing a fluorescently labeled novel component of Zebrafish germ cell granules termed Granulito, we followed the morphology and distribution of the granules. We show that whereas these granules initially exhibit a wide size variation, by the end of the first day of development they become a homogeneous population of medium size granules. We investigated this resizing event and demonstrated the role of microtubules and the minus-end microtubule dependent motor protein Dynein in the process. Last, we show that the function of the germ cell granule resident protein the Tudor domain containing protein-7 (Tdrd7) is required for determination of granule morphology and number.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Zebrafish germ cell granules undergo a transformation process, which involves germ cell specific proteins as well as the microtubular network.
Figure 1. Expression pattern of granulito RNA and subcellular localization of the Ganulito protein. A) Whole-mount in situ hybridizations using granulito antisense RNA probe at the indicated stages. granulito is enriched at the region where the germ plasm resides (cleavage furrows, arrowheads) and is expressed in the primordial germ cells at later stages (arrowheads). B) Alignment of the zebrafish Granulito protein with those from Xenopus leavis and Homo sapiens. Red signifies conservation in all 3 species, green labels conserved substitutions. C) Subcellular localization of Granulito-EYFP. Granulito localizes specifically to germ cell granules as it colocalizes with Vasa protein. D) Germ cells of kop-granulito-dsRedex-nos1-3'UTR transgenic fish whose membrane and nucleus are labeled in green (except for the 4 hours stage where the nucleus is not labeled). Initially, germ cell granules with a large variety of sizes are observed. As development proceeds, the variation in germ cell granule size decreases. E) Granule size distribution at different stages. F) Variance of granule size at different stages. N >100 granules for each time point.
Figure 2. Germ cell granule behavior during cell division in live embryos. A) During interphase and before nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD), the granules (labeled with Vasa-dsRed) show an organized localization around the nucleus (visualized with LaminB2-GFP). During early prophase, the nuclear envelop disassembles and germ cell granules change their shape (arrow). Once the envelope is completely disassembled granules that changed their shape readopt their spherical shape (arrowhead). All granules spread in the cytoplasm and are segregated into daughter cells. B) After cytokinesis, the nuclear envelope reassembles (n) and a group of granules spread in the cytoplasm readopt perinuclear localization (asterisk). Granules are labeled with Vasa-dsRed, nuclear envelope with LaminB2-GFP, and plasma membrane with farnesylated GFP. C) Movement of granules towards the nuclear envelope labeled with NUP155-GFP and visualized by confocal microscopy. Granules move directly (asterisk) to the area where the nuclear envelope is reassembling (n) during cytokinesis. All movies were recorded in 10 hpf embryos.
Figure 3. Microtubules colocalize with germ cell granules. A) Immunostaining of Vasa protein and α-Tubulin in germ cells of 6 hpf embryos. Perinuclear granules attached to microtubules are shown in detail. n and arrowhead depicts the nucleus and granules expressing Tubulin, respectively. B) At 16 hpf, germ cell perinuclear granules show expression of α-Tubulin within their structure (arrowhead). Nucleus is depicted by n. Pinhole value is 1.22. C).Germ cells in live 11 hpf embryos have a microtubular cage surrounding the nuclei, where microtubules originated from the MTOC (arrow) span the granules (detail). Microtubules were labeled with Clip170- GFP, and granules with Vasa-dsRed. D) Cytoplasmic granules colocalize with microtubular fibers projecting from the nuclear cage (detail). Tubulin expression is also found within the granule (arrowhead) of 11 hpf embryos. Nucleus is depicted by n. E) A close-up view of a germ cell of a 11 hpf embryos reveals flow of cytoplasmic granules not associated with microtubules (arrowhead) into the protrusion (asterisk) while others remain stable in colocalization with microtubules projected from the MTOC (arrow).
Figure 4. Granules structure is affected after microtubule disruption. A) Confocal section of germ cells in control embryos exposed to DMSO for 6 hours. Germ cell granules show normal perinuclear localization and distribution into small structures (arrow). B) Confocal section of germ cells in embryos exposed to 1 μg/ml of nocodazole for 6 hours. Nocodazole treated cells exhibit a conglomeration of Vasa positive granules forming a large granule (arrow). C) Embryos exposed to same conditions mentioned above. Vasa-dsRed labels granules, LaminB2-GFP labels nuclear envelop. The experiment shows how after laminB2 network disassembles, individual granules fuse forming bigger structures (asterisk). Cell outline is depicted with white dashed lines. All experiments were done in 11 hpf embryos.
Figure 5. Microtubules localization relative to germ cell granules during different stages of germ cell mitosis. Immunostaining of germ cells undergoing cell division. Granules are labeled with anti-Vasa antibody and microtubules with anti-α-Tubulin antibody. A) During beginning of mitosis, α-Tubulin- expressing granules (arrowhead) appear connected to microtubular fibers (detail) projecting from what appear as centrosomes (asterisks). B) At a later stage of mitosis, when the two presumed centrosomes are located at the poles of the cell, projecting spindle microtubules reach at Vasa and α-Tubulin expressing granules (detail). C) When mitosis is close to termination, granules are enriched around the area where the nucleus reassembles (arrows). Specific colocalization of granules with astral microtubules is shown in detail. D) Germ cell granules (arrowhead) move towards the forming nucleus (n) through a path of spindle microtubules. E) Granules move to the area where the nucleus forms. Nuclear envelope reassembly was visualized by NUPL1. Elongated granules (arrowhead) move from the cytokinetic region to the site of the forming nucleus (n) and re-adopt a spherical shape upon arrival All experiments were performed on 10 hpf embryos.
Figure 6. Dynein localize to germ cell granules and is involved in granule fragmentation. A) DynL2-GFP is localized to nucleus, cytoplasm and to germ cell granules. Granule DynL2-GFP localization patterns are diverse, ranging from ring-like structures around large granules (left panel, arrowhead, nucleus is depicted by n), dots within the granules (arrowhead, middle panel) or accumulations can also be observed on the periphery of such structures (arrowhead, right panel). Interphase cells where analyzed in 6 to 10 hpf embryos. Note that Vasa-dsRed and DynL2-GFP colocalization preferentially occurs in the largest granule of the cell. B) Germ cells of 9 hpf embryos expressing DynL2-GFP were analyzed in vivo by epifluorescence microscopy. DynL2-GFP is localized to a large germ cell granule where two centers of high concentration are observed preceding the division of the granule (asterisks in B,C). C) Merge of B together with Vasa-dsRed to visualize the granules. D) Immunostaining of control germ cells of 24 hpf embryos showing the normal number (shown graphically in F) and size (shown graphically in G) of Vasa expressing granules n = 33 cells and 191 granules (G). Dynein inhibition in germ cells of 24 hpf embryos by p50 overexpression reduces the number of granules per germ cell while the size of germ cell granules increases. n = 116 cells and 154 granules (E,G). TTtest for F: p < 1E-8. TTest for G: p < 1E-14.
Figure 7. Tdrd7 function is required for proper germ cell granule architecture. A) Tdrd7-GFP fusion protein colocalizes with the germ cell granule marker Vasa-dsRed. A 3-somite stage embryo corresponds to 11 hpf embryo. B) Tdrd7 function is required the formation of uniform normal sized granules. A 3D projection of granules labeled with Vasa antibody in 24 hours old control cells (left panel), in Tdrd7 depleted cells (middle) and in cells from embryos co-injected with the antisense oligonucleotide directed against Tdrd7 and an RNA encoding Tdrd7 that is resistant for the inhibition by the antisense oligonucleotide (right). C) Size of the largest granule in 24 hpf PGC. N = 18 cells for control, 16 for morpholino 1 injected embryos (T-test compared with the control, p < 10-3), 19 for morpholino 2 and 16 cells in which the phenotype was reversed by co-injection of the morpholino resistant Tdrd7 RNA. D) Number of granules in 24 hpf PGC. N = 13 cells for control, 19 cells for morpholino 1 (T-test compared with the control, p < 10-2), 26 cells for morpholino 2 and 13 cells in which the phenotype was reversed by co-injection of the morpholino resistant Tdrd7 RNA., TTest p < 0,003). E) Granule-size distribution is increased in cells knocked down for Tdrd7 as the proportion of the very small and very large granules is increased. N = 223 granules for control, 150 granules for morpholino 1 and 132 granules in which the phenotype was reversed by co-injection of the morpholino resistant Tdrd7 RNA.
Arkov,
The role of Tudor domains in germline development and polar granule architecture.
2006, Pubmed
Arkov,
The role of Tudor domains in germline development and polar granule architecture.
2006,
Pubmed
Berekelya,
The protein encoded by the germ plasm RNA Germes associates with dynein light chains and functions in Xenopus germline development.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Birky,
The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division.
1983,
Pubmed
Blaser,
Transition from non-motile behaviour to directed migration during early PGC development in zebrafish.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Blaser,
Migration of zebrafish primordial germ cells: a role for myosin contraction and cytoplasmic flow.
2006,
Pubmed
Boswell,
tudor, a gene required for assembly of the germ plasm in Drosophila melanogaster.
1985,
Pubmed
Braat,
Germ line development in fishes.
1999,
Pubmed
Burkhardt,
Overexpression of the dynamitin (p50) subunit of the dynactin complex disrupts dynein-dependent maintenance of membrane organelle distribution.
1997,
Pubmed
Chuma,
Tdrd1/Mtr-1, a tudor-related gene, is essential for male germ-cell differentiation and nuage/germinal granule formation in mice.
2006,
Pubmed
Draper,
nanos1 is required to maintain oocyte production in adult zebrafish.
2007,
Pubmed
Echeverri,
Molecular characterization of the 50-kD subunit of dynactin reveals function for the complex in chromosome alignment and spindle organization during mitosis.
1996,
Pubmed
Ephrussi,
Induction of germ cell formation by oskar.
1992,
Pubmed
Hashimoto,
Localized maternal factors are required for zebrafish germ cell formation.
2004,
Pubmed
Hauptmann,
Two-color whole-mount in situ hybridization to vertebrate and Drosophila embryos.
1994,
Pubmed
Hay,
A protein component of Drosophila polar granules is encoded by vasa and has extensive sequence similarity to ATP-dependent helicases.
1988,
Pubmed
Hayden,
Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells.
1990,
Pubmed
Hird,
Segregation of germ granules in living Caenorhabditis elegans embryos: cell-type-specific mechanisms for cytoplasmic localisation.
1996,
Pubmed
Holleran,
Centractin (ARP1) associates with spectrin revealing a potential mechanism to link dynactin to intracellular organelles.
1996,
Pubmed
Holleran,
beta III spectrin binds to the Arp1 subunit of dynactin.
2001,
Pubmed
Holy,
Dynamic instability of microtubules as an efficient way to search in space.
1994,
Pubmed
Houwing,
A role for Piwi and piRNAs in germ cell maintenance and transposon silencing in Zebrafish.
2007,
Pubmed
Illmensee,
Transplantation of posterior polar plasm in Drosophila. Induction of germ cells at the anterior pole of the egg.
1974,
Pubmed
Jowett,
Whole-mount in situ hybridizations on zebrafish embryos using a mixture of digoxigenin- and fluorescein-labelled probes.
1994,
Pubmed
Kedde,
RNA-binding protein Dnd1 inhibits microRNA access to target mRNA.
2007,
Pubmed
Kimmel,
Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
King,
The dynein microtubule motor.
2000,
Pubmed
Knaut,
Zebrafish vasa RNA but not its protein is a component of the germ plasm and segregates asymmetrically before germline specification.
2000,
Pubmed
Köprunner,
A zebrafish nanos-related gene is essential for the development of primordial germ cells.
2001,
Pubmed
Kosako,
Rho-kinase/ROCK is involved in cytokinesis through the phosphorylation of myosin light chain and not ezrin/radixin/moesin proteins at the cleavage furrow.
2000,
Pubmed
Lasko,
The product of the Drosophila gene vasa is very similar to eukaryotic initiation factor-4A.
1988,
Pubmed
Li,
Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application.
2001,
Pubmed
Madaule,
Role of citron kinase as a target of the small GTPase Rho in cytokinesis.
1998,
Pubmed
Mahowald,
Polar granules of Drosophila. II. Ultrastructural changes during early embryogenesis.
1968,
Pubmed
Malmanche,
The spindle assembly checkpoint: preventing chromosome mis-segregation during mitosis and meiosis.
2006,
Pubmed
McLaren,
Signaling for germ cells.
1999,
Pubmed
Mishima,
Differential regulation of germline mRNAs in soma and germ cells by zebrafish miR-430.
2006,
Pubmed
Mogilner,
Modeling mitosis.
2006,
Pubmed
Müller,
Expression of a linker histone-like gene in the primordial germ cells in zebrafish.
2002,
Pubmed
Pan,
RNF17, a component of the mammalian germ cell nuage, is essential for spermiogenesis.
2005,
Pubmed
Pelegri,
A mutation in the zebrafish maternal-effect gene nebel affects furrow formation and vasa RNA localization.
,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pelegri,
Maternal factors in zebrafish development.
2003,
Pubmed
Perez,
CLIP-170 highlights growing microtubule ends in vivo.
1999,
Pubmed
Raz,
The function and regulation of vasa-like genes in germ-cell development.
2000,
Pubmed
Saffman,
Germline development in vertebrates and invertebrates.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shima,
An ordered inheritance strategy for the Golgi apparatus: visualization of mitotic disassembly reveals a role for the mitotic spindle.
1998,
Pubmed
Tan,
Ziwi, the zebrafish homologue of the Drosophila piwi: co-localization with vasa at the embryonic genital ridge and gonad-specific expression in the adults.
2002,
Pubmed
Theusch,
Separate pathways of RNA recruitment lead to the compartmentalization of the zebrafish germ plasm.
2006,
Pubmed
Toyooka,
Expression and intracellular localization of mouse Vasa-homologue protein during germ cell development.
2000,
Pubmed
Warren,
Organelle inheritance.
1996,
Pubmed
Weidinger,
Regulation of zebrafish primordial germ cell migration by attraction towards an intermediate target.
2002,
Pubmed
Weidinger,
dead end, a novel vertebrate germ plasm component, is required for zebrafish primordial germ cell migration and survival.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Welte,
Bidirectional transport along microtubules.
2004,
Pubmed
Whitington,
Quantitative studies of germ plasm and germ cells during early embryogenesis of Xenopus laevis.
1975,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wolke,
Multiple levels of posttranscriptional control lead to germ line-specific gene expression in the zebrafish.
2002,
Pubmed