Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
XB-ART-8304
Neuropharmacology 2001 Oct 01;415:539-45. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00099-5.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Evidence for distinct conformations of the two alpha 1 subunits in diazepam-bound GABA(A) receptors.

Williams DB , Akabas MH .


???displayArticle.abstract???
Benzodiazepines allosterically modulate GABA(A) receptors to increase currents induced by submaximal GABA concentrations. Benzodiazepine-induced conformational changes in the transmembrane domain increase the reactivity of cysteines substituted for a subset of residues in the alpha(1) subunit M3 membrane-spanning segment. With the cysteine-substitution mutant alpha(1)F296Cbeta(1)gamma(2) we previously noted that p-chloromercuribenzenesulfonate (pCMBS(-)) modification in the presence of diazepam potentiated subsequent GABA-induced currents. In contrast, pCMBS(-) modification in the presence of GABA caused inhibition of subsequent responses. We now show that in the presence of diazepam, pCMBS(-) only reacts with the engineered cysteine in one of the two alpha subunits; whereas, in the presence of GABA, pCMBS(-) reacts with the cysteine in the other alpha subunit, or with both cysteines. This implies that the two alpha subunits have distinct conformations in the diazepam-bound state. Based on analysis of single channel kinetic data, others have hypothesized that diazepam only alters the GABA affinity of one of the two GABA binding sites. The results presented here provide structural evidence to support the hypothesis that diazepam binding only alters the conformation of one of the two alpha subunits in a GABA(A) receptor and provides new insights into the mechanism of allosteric potentiation by benzodiazepines.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 11587708
???displayArticle.link??? Neuropharmacology
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]