Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Two transects reveal remarkable variation in gene flow on opposite ends of a European toad hybrid zone.
van Riemsdijk I
,
Arntzen JW
,
Bucciarelli GM
,
McCartney-Melstad E
,
Rafajlović M
,
Scott PA
,
Toffelmier E
,
Shaffer HB
,
Wielstra B
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Speciation entails a reduction in gene flow between lineages. The rates at which genomic regions become isolated varies across space and time. Barrier markers are linked to putative genes involved in (processes of) reproductive isolation, and, when observed over two transects, indicate species-wide processes. In contrast, transect-specific putative barrier markers suggest local processes. We studied two widely separated transects along the 900 km hybrid zone between Bufo bufo and B. spinosus, in northern and southern France, for ~1200 RADseq markers. We used genomic and geographic cline analyses to identify barrier markers based on their restricted introgression, and found that some markers are transect-specific, while others are shared between transects. Twenty-six barrier markers were shared across both transects, of which some are clustered in the same chromosomal region, suggesting that their associated genes are involved in reduced gene flow across the entire hybrid zone. Transect-specific barrier markers were twice as numerous in the southern than in the northern transect, suggesting that the overall barrier effect is weaker in northern France. We hypothesize that this is consistent with a longer period of secondary contact in southern France. The smaller number of introgressed genes in the northern transect shows considerably more gene flow towards the southern (B. spinosus) than the northern species (B. bufo). We hypothesize that hybrid zone movement in northern France and hybrid zone stability in southern France explain this pattern. The Bufo hybrid zone provides an excellent opportunity to separate a general barrier effect from localized gene flow-reducing conditions.
Fig. 1: Overview of the Bufo hybrid zone and genetic data presented in this study.
Maps with (a) the distribution of Bufo bufo and B. spinosus in Europe and North Africa, with small labeled squares indicating the locations of insert map (b) for the northern transect (sample locations 6.N-16.N), and insert map (c) for the southern transect (sample locations 6.S-17.S). The reference populations for B. bufo are 1-5.Bb, and for B. spinosus are 18-22.Bs. The base map for panels b and c was downloaded from mapsland. Bar graphs in panels b and c are the result of Structure with K = 2 on the full 50% missingness dataset, taking a random SNP from each of the 4869 assembled RAD markers. Blue indicates B. bufo ancestry, red bars indicate B. spinosus. Panel d shows the principal component analysis of the same 50% dataset. The reference populations of B. bufo are colored blue and of B. spinosus red. Transect populations are black (“.N” = northern transect, “.S” = southern transect). Ellipses represent the 95% inertia (based on the percentile) of the corresponding group. The bar graph on the right shows the eigenvalues for the first 5 principle components.
Fig. 2: Markers identified as β or α outlier by Bayesian genomic cline (BGC) analysis, also stand out in their geographic cline when comparing the parameters ‘center’ and ‘width’ (HZAR).
Heterozygote deficiency outliers (β > 0) have steep geographic clines, both in the (a) northern transect and (b) southern transect. For markers showing directional introgression (α outliers in BGC), the geographical cline has a shifted center for both the (c) northern transect and (d) southern transect.
Fig. 3: Geographic cline graphs coloured by Bayesian Genomic Cline (BGC) analysis outlier identification.
Geographic clines for barrier markers (β > 0, green) for the (a) northern transect and (b) southern transect; markers showing introgression into B. spinosus (α < 0, orange) for the (c) northern transect and (d) southern transect; and markers showing introgression into B. bufo (α > 0, blue) for the (e) northern transect, and (f) southern transect. In all panels, frequency of the B. spinosus allele on the y-axis and distance along the transect on the x-axis. The gray clines are all other markers (including all outliers of other types). Inward ticks on the top of each graph and notation near inward ticks on the top of the graph (panels a and b only) refers to locations in Fig. 1.
Fig. 4: Alignment of RAD markers to the B. bufo genome for each transect.
Gray lines represent markers which were not identified as outlier by BGC analysis. Above the line are heterozygosity (β) outliers, below the line are directional gene flow outliers (α). Outlier identity is explained in the legend below the figure. Red arrows point to RAD markers which were heterozygote deficiency outliers in both transects.
Abbott,
Hybridization and speciation.
2013, Pubmed
Abbott,
Hybridization and speciation.
2013,
Pubmed
Arntzen,
An amphibian species pushed out of Britain by a moving hybrid zone.
2019,
Pubmed
Arntzen,
Hybrid zone formation and contrasting outcomes of secondary contact over transects in common toads.
2017,
Pubmed
Arntzen,
Concordant morphological and molecular clines in a contact zone of the Common and Spined toad (Bufo bufo and B. spinosus) in the northwest of France.
2016,
Pubmed
Baack,
A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation.
2007,
Pubmed
Barton,
MULTILOCUS CLINES.
1983,
Pubmed
Barton,
Does hybridization influence speciation?
2013,
Pubmed
Bayona-Vásquez,
Adapterama III: Quadruple-indexed, double/triple-enzyme RADseq libraries (2RAD/3RAD).
2019,
Pubmed
Benestan,
Conservation genomics of natural and managed populations: building a conceptual and practical framework.
2016,
Pubmed
Bierne,
The coupling hypothesis: why genome scans may fail to map local adaptation genes.
2011,
Pubmed
Brodie,
How far from the SNP may the causative genes be?
2016,
Pubmed
Buerkle,
Low intraspecific variation for genomic isolation between hybridizing sunflower species.
2001,
Pubmed
Buggs,
Empirical study of hybrid zone movement.
2007,
Pubmed
Butlin,
Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation.
2018,
Pubmed
Chhatre,
StrAuto: automation and parallelization of STRUCTURE analysis.
2017,
Pubmed
Currat,
The hidden side of invasions: massive introgression by local genes.
2008,
Pubmed
Dagilis,
The evolution of hybrid fitness during speciation.
2019,
Pubmed
Derryberry,
HZAR: hybrid zone analysis using an R software package.
2014,
Pubmed
Dufresnes,
Hybridization and introgression between toads with different sex chromosome systems.
2020,
Pubmed
Dufresnes,
Mass of genes rather than master genes underlie the genomic architecture of amphibian speciation.
2021,
Pubmed
Eaton,
PyRAD: assembly of de novo RADseq loci for phylogenetic analyses.
2014,
Pubmed
Feulner,
Genome evolution, structural rearrangements and speciation.
2017,
Pubmed
Fitzpatrick,
Estimating ancestry and heterozygosity of hybrids using molecular markers.
2012,
Pubmed
Francis,
pophelper: an R package and web app to analyse and visualize population structure.
2017,
Pubmed
Garcia-Porta,
Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of the west-palearctic common toads (Bufo bufo species complex).
2012,
Pubmed
Gel,
karyoploteR: an R/Bioconductor package to plot customizable genomes displaying arbitrary data.
2017,
Pubmed
Glenn,
Adapterama I: universal stubs and primers for 384 unique dual-indexed or 147,456 combinatorially-indexed Illumina libraries (iTru & iNext).
2019,
Pubmed
Gompert,
Bayesian estimation of genomic clines.
2011,
Pubmed
Gompert,
bgc: Software for Bayesian estimation of genomic clines.
2012,
Pubmed
Gompert,
Genomics of isolation in hybrids.
2012,
Pubmed
Graham,
Impacts of degraded DNA on restriction enzyme associated DNA sequencing (RADSeq).
2015,
Pubmed
Harrison,
Hybridization, introgression, and the nature of species boundaries.
2014,
Pubmed
Harrison,
Heterogeneous genome divergence, differential introgression, and the origin and structure of hybrid zones.
2016,
Pubmed
Hewitt,
Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies.
1988,
Pubmed
Hoffberg,
RADcap: sequence capture of dual-digest RADseq libraries with identifiable duplicates and reduced missing data.
2016,
Pubmed
Janoušek,
Genome-wide architecture of reproductive isolation in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus.
2012,
Pubmed
Jombart,
adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers.
2008,
Pubmed
Jombart,
adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data.
2011,
Pubmed
Kopelman,
Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K.
2015,
Pubmed
Larson,
Differential introgression in a mosaic hybrid zone reveals candidate barrier genes.
2013,
Pubmed
Larson,
Structure of a mosaic hybrid zone between the field crickets Gryllus firmus and G. pennsylvanicus.
2013,
Pubmed
Larson,
Gene flow and the maintenance of species boundaries.
2014,
Pubmed
Lawrence,
Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges.
2013,
Pubmed
Li,
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
2009,
Pubmed
Macholán,
Genetic analysis of autosomal and X-linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone.
2007,
Pubmed
Mandeville,
Highly variable reproductive isolation among pairs of Catostomus species.
2015,
Pubmed
Mi,
PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools.
2019,
Pubmed
Parchman,
The genomic consequences of adaptive divergence and reproductive isolation between species of manakins.
2013,
Pubmed
Polechová,
Genetic drift widens the expected cline but narrows the expected cline width.
2011,
Pubmed
Pritchard,
Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.
2000,
Pubmed
Rafajlović,
A universal mechanism generating clusters of differentiated loci during divergence-with-migration.
2016,
Pubmed
Ravinet,
Interpreting the genomic landscape of speciation: a road map for finding barriers to gene flow.
2017,
Pubmed
Recuero,
Multilocus species tree analyses resolve the radiation of the widespread Bufo bufo species group (Anura, Bufonidae).
2012,
Pubmed
Ren,
A missense mutation in PPARD causes a major QTL effect on ear size in pigs.
2011,
Pubmed
Rice,
ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.
1989,
Pubmed
Rieseberg,
Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species.
1999,
Pubmed
Rousset,
genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux.
2008,
Pubmed
Sequeira,
Genetic traces of hybrid zone movement across a fragmented habitat.
2022,
Pubmed
Stankowski,
Geographic cline analysis as a tool for studying genome-wide variation: a case study of pollinator-mediated divergence in a monkeyflower.
2017,
Pubmed
Streicher,
The genome sequence of the common toad, Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758).
2021,
Pubmed
Szklarczyk,
The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets.
2021,
Pubmed
Teeter,
The variable genomic architecture of isolation between hybridizing species of house mice.
2010,
Pubmed
Vines,
Cline coupling and uncoupling in a stickleback hybrid zone.
2016,
Pubmed
Visser,
Stabilization of a salamander moving hybrid zone.
2017,
Pubmed
WICKBOM,
Cytological studies on Dipnoi, Urodela, Anura, and Emys.
1945,
Pubmed
Zhang,
A genome-wide association study of limb bone length using a Large White × Minzhu intercross population.
2014,
Pubmed
van Riemsdijk,
Testing an hypothesis of hybrid zone movement for toads in France.
2019,
Pubmed