Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Nat Struct Mol Biol
2023 Jan 01;301:115-124. doi: 10.1038/s41594-022-00871-y.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Replication fork uncoupling causes nascent strand degradation and fork reversal.
Kavlashvili T
,
Liu W
,
Mohamed TM
,
Cortez D
,
Dewar JM
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Genotoxins cause nascent strand degradation (NSD) and fork reversal during DNA replication. NSD and fork reversal are crucial for genome stability and are exploited by chemotherapeutic approaches. However, it is unclear how NSD and fork reversal are triggered. Additionally, the fate of the replicative helicase during these processes is unknown. We developed a biochemical approach to study synchronous, localized NSD and fork reversal using Xenopus egg extracts and validated this approach with experiments in human cells. We show that replication fork uncoupling stimulates NSD of both nascent strands and progressive conversion of uncoupled forks to reversed forks. Notably, the replicative helicase remains bound during NSD and fork reversal. Unexpectedly, NSD occurs before and after fork reversal, indicating that multiple degradation steps take place. Overall, our data show that uncoupling causes NSD and fork reversal and elucidate key events that precede fork reversal.
Ait Saada,
Preserving replication fork integrity and competence via the homologous recombination pathway.
2018, Pubmed
Ait Saada,
Preserving replication fork integrity and competence via the homologous recombination pathway.
2018,
Pubmed
Amunugama,
Replication Fork Reversal during DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Requires CMG Unloading.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bai,
HLTF Promotes Fork Reversal, Limiting Replication Stress Resistance and Preventing Multiple Mechanisms of Unrestrained DNA Synthesis.
2020,
Pubmed
Berti,
The plasticity of DNA replication forks in response to clinically relevant genotoxic stress.
2020,
Pubmed
Berti,
Human RECQ1 promotes restart of replication forks reversed by DNA topoisomerase I inhibition.
2013,
Pubmed
Biebricher,
PICH: a DNA translocase specially adapted for processing anaphase bridge DNA.
2013,
Pubmed
Byun,
Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bétous,
SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication.
2012,
Pubmed
Chaudhury,
FANCD2-controlled chromatin access of the Fanconi-associated nuclease FAN1 is crucial for the recovery of stalled replication forks.
2014,
Pubmed
Cong,
Replication gaps are a key determinant of PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality with BRCA deficiency.
2021,
Pubmed
Coquel,
SAMHD1 acts at stalled replication forks to prevent interferon induction.
2018,
Pubmed
Couch,
ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Deegan,
CMG helicase disassembly is controlled by replication fork DNA, replisome components and a ubiquitin threshold.
2020,
Pubmed
Deng,
Mitotic CDK Promotes Replisome Disassembly, Fork Breakage, and Complex DNA Rearrangements.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dewar,
The mechanism of DNA replication termination in vertebrates.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dewar,
CRL2Lrr1 promotes unloading of the vertebrate replisome from chromatin during replication termination.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dias,
Understanding and overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy.
2021,
Pubmed
Dungrawala,
RADX Promotes Genome Stability and Modulates Chemosensitivity by Regulating RAD51 at Replication Forks.
2017,
Pubmed
Dupré,
A forward chemical genetic screen reveals an inhibitor of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fugger,
FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks.
2015,
Pubmed
Graham,
Independent and Stochastic Action of DNA Polymerases in the Replisome.
2017,
Pubmed
Hanada,
The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks.
2007,
Pubmed
Hashimoto,
Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Heintzman,
Topoisomerase II Is Crucial for Fork Convergence during Vertebrate Replication Termination.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Higgs,
BOD1L Is Required to Suppress Deleterious Resection of Stressed Replication Forks.
2015,
Pubmed
Hu,
The intra-S phase checkpoint targets Dna2 to prevent stalled replication forks from reversing.
2012,
Pubmed
Huang,
The DNA translocase FANCM/MHF promotes replication traverse of DNA interstrand crosslinks.
2013,
Pubmed
Hunter,
The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination.
2001,
Pubmed
Iannascoli,
The WRN exonuclease domain protects nascent strands from pathological MRE11/EXO1-dependent degradation.
2015,
Pubmed
Klein Douwel,
XPF-ERCC1 acts in Unhooking DNA interstrand crosslinks in cooperation with FANCD2 and FANCP/SLX4.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kolinjivadi,
Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kose,
Duplex DNA engagement and RPA oppositely regulate the DNA-unwinding rate of CMG helicase.
2020,
Pubmed
Lebofsky,
DNA replication in nucleus-free Xenopus egg extracts.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lemaçon,
MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells.
2017,
Pubmed
Liu,
Two replication fork remodeling pathways generate nuclease substrates for distinct fork protection factors.
2020,
Pubmed
Liu,
A Selective Small Molecule DNA2 Inhibitor for Sensitization of Human Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy.
2016,
Pubmed
Long,
Regression supports two mechanisms of fork processing in phage T4.
2008,
Pubmed
Low,
The DNA replication fork suppresses CMG unloading from chromatin before termination.
2020,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Manosas,
Direct observation of stalled fork restart via fork regression in the T4 replication system.
2012,
Pubmed
Mason,
Non-enzymatic roles of human RAD51 at stalled replication forks.
2019,
Pubmed
Masuda-Ozawa,
Single-molecule sorting reveals how ubiquitylation affects substrate recognition and activities of FBH1 helicase.
2013,
Pubmed
Mijic,
Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.
2017,
Pubmed
Mutreja,
ATR-Mediated Global Fork Slowing and Reversal Assist Fork Traverse and Prevent Chromosomal Breakage at DNA Interstrand Cross-Links.
2018,
Pubmed
Nieminuszczy,
EXD2 Protects Stressed Replication Forks and Is Required for Cell Viability in the Absence of BRCA1/2.
2019,
Pubmed
Paudyal,
Dna2 initiates resection at clean DNA double-strand breaks.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Petermann,
Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair.
2010,
Pubmed
Quinet,
Replication Fork Reversal: Players and Guardians.
2017,
Pubmed
Quinet,
PRIMPOL-Mediated Adaptive Response Suppresses Replication Fork Reversal in BRCA-Deficient Cells.
2020,
Pubmed
Ray Chaudhuri,
Replication fork stability confers chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient cells.
2016,
Pubmed
Ray Chaudhuri,
Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Rickman,
Advances in understanding DNA processing and protection at stalled replication forks.
2019,
Pubmed
Rickman,
Distinct roles of BRCA2 in replication fork protection in response to hydroxyurea and DNA interstrand cross-links.
2020,
Pubmed
Schlacher,
Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11.
2011,
Pubmed
Somyajit,
Homology-directed repair protects the replicating genome from metabolic assaults.
2021,
Pubmed
Sparks,
The CMG Helicase Bypasses DNA-Protein Cross-Links to Facilitate Their Repair.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Taglialatela,
Restoration of Replication Fork Stability in BRCA1- and BRCA2-Deficient Cells by Inactivation of SNF2-Family Fork Remodelers.
2017,
Pubmed
Thangavel,
DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells.
2015,
Pubmed
Tian,
The ZATT-TOP2A-PICH Axis Drives Extensive Replication Fork Reversal to Promote Genome Stability.
2021,
Pubmed
Timson,
Hydroxyurea.
1975,
Pubmed
Tirman,
Temporally distinct post-replicative repair mechanisms fill PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps in human cells.
2021,
Pubmed
Toledo,
ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA.
2013,
Pubmed
Vallerga,
Rad51 recombinase prevents Mre11 nuclease-dependent degradation and excessive PrimPol-mediated elongation of nascent DNA after UV irradiation.
2015,
Pubmed
Vrtis,
Single-strand DNA breaks cause replisome disassembly.
2021,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vujanovic,
Replication Fork Slowing and Reversal upon DNA Damage Require PCNA Polyubiquitination and ZRANB3 DNA Translocase Activity.
2017,
Pubmed
Walter,
Regulated chromosomal DNA replication in the absence of a nucleus.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walter,
Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication: origin unwinding and sequential chromatin association of Cdc45, RPA, and DNA polymerase alpha.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wasserman,
Replication Fork Activation Is Enabled by a Single-Stranded DNA Gate in CMG Helicase.
2019,
Pubmed
Wong,
Processing of DNA Polymerase-Blocking Lesions during Genome Replication Is Spatially and Temporally Segregated from Replication Forks.
2020,
Pubmed
Zellweger,
Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells.
2015,
Pubmed
Zhang,
DNA interstrand cross-link repair requires replication-fork convergence.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zhu,
Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends.
2008,
Pubmed
