Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Science
2012 May 04;3366081:593-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1218498.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Removal of shelterin reveals the telomere end-protection problem.
Sfeir A
,
de Lange T
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The telomere end-protection problem is defined by the aggregate of DNA damage signaling and repair pathways that require repression at telomeres. To define the end-protection problem, we removed the whole shelterin complex from mouse telomeres through conditional deletion of TRF1 and TRF2 in nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) deficient cells. The data reveal two DNA damage response pathways not previously observed upon deletion of individual shelterin proteins. The shelterin-free telomeres are processed by microhomology-mediated alternative-NHEJ when Ku70/80 is absent and are attacked by nucleolytic degradation in the absence of 53BP1. The data establish that the end-protection problem is specified by six pathways [ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related) signaling, classical-NHEJ, alt-NHEJ, homologous recombination, and resection] and show how shelterin acts with general DNA damage response factors to solve this problem.
Baumann,
Protection of telomeres by the Ku protein in fission yeast.
2000, Pubmed
Baumann,
Protection of telomeres by the Ku protein in fission yeast.
2000,
Pubmed
Boboila,
Alternative end-joining catalyzes class switch recombination in the absence of both Ku70 and DNA ligase 4.
2010,
Pubmed
Bouwman,
53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers.
2010,
Pubmed
Bunting,
53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks.
2010,
Pubmed
Celli,
DNA processing is not required for ATM-mediated telomere damage response after TRF2 deletion.
2005,
Pubmed
Celli,
Ku70 stimulates fusion of dysfunctional telomeres yet protects chromosome ends from homologous recombination.
2006,
Pubmed
Denchi,
Protection of telomeres through independent control of ATM and ATR by TRF2 and POT1.
2007,
Pubmed
Dimitrova,
53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility.
2008,
Pubmed
Gravel,
Yeast Ku as a regulator of chromosomal DNA end structure.
1998,
Pubmed
Gravel,
DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection.
2008,
Pubmed
Hockemeyer,
Recent expansion of the telomeric complex in rodents: Two distinct POT1 proteins protect mouse telomeres.
2006,
Pubmed
Kibe,
Telomere protection by TPP1 is mediated by POT1a and POT1b.
2010,
Pubmed
Mansour,
The alternative end-joining pathway for repair of DNA double-strand breaks requires PARP1 but is not dependent upon microhomologies.
2010,
Pubmed
Martínez,
Increased telomere fragility and fusions resulting from TRF1 deficiency lead to degenerative pathologies and increased cancer in mice.
2009,
Pubmed
Menear,
4-[3-(4-cyclopropanecarbonylpiperazine-1-carbonyl)-4-fluorobenzyl]-2H-phthalazin-1-one: a novel bioavailable inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.
2008,
Pubmed
Mimitou,
Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing.
2008,
Pubmed
Palm,
How shelterin protects mammalian telomeres.
2008,
Pubmed
Palm,
Functional dissection of human and mouse POT1 proteins.
2009,
Pubmed
Polotnianka,
The yeast Ku heterodimer is essential for protection of the telomere against nucleolytic and recombinational activities.
1998,
Pubmed
Rai,
The function of classical and alternative non-homologous end-joining pathways in the fusion of dysfunctional telomeres.
2010,
Pubmed
Riha,
Ku is required for telomeric C-rich strand maintenance but not for end-to-end chromosome fusions in Arabidopsis.
2003,
Pubmed
Sfeir,
Mammalian telomeres resemble fragile sites and require TRF1 for efficient replication.
2009,
Pubmed
Sfeir,
Loss of Rap1 induces telomere recombination in the absence of NHEJ or a DNA damage signal.
2010,
Pubmed
Simsek,
Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4-ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation.
2010,
Pubmed
Simsek,
DNA ligase III promotes alternative nonhomologous end-joining during chromosomal translocation formation.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Takai,
Telomere protection by TPP1/POT1 requires tethering to TIN2.
2011,
Pubmed
Wang,
PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways.
2006,
Pubmed
Yan,
IgH class switching and translocations use a robust non-classical end-joining pathway.
2007,
Pubmed
Zhu,
Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends.
2008,
Pubmed
de Lange,
How telomeres solve the end-protection problem.
2009,
Pubmed
