Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
PLoS One
2017 Jan 01;1210:e0186420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186420.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
A mannitol/sorbitol receptor stimulates dietary intake in Tribolium castaneum.
Takada T
,
Sato R
,
Kikuta S
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
In insects, perception of chemical stimuli is involved in the acceptance or rejection of food. Gustatory receptors (Grs) that regulate external signals in chemosensory organs have been found in many insects. Tribolium castaneum, a major pest of stored products, possesses over 200 Gr genes. An expanded repertoire of Gr genes appears to be required for diet recognition in species that are generalist feeders; however, it remains unclear whether T. castaneum recognizes a suite of chemicals common to many products or whether its feeding is activated by specific chemicals, and whether its Grs are involved in feeding behavior. It is difficult to determine the food preferences of T. castaneum based on dietary intake due to a lack of appropriate methodology. This study established a novel dietary intake estimation method using gypsum, designated the TribUTE (Tribolium Urges To Eat) assay. For this assay, T. castaneum adults were fed a gypsum block without added organic compounds. Sweet preference was determined by adding sweeteners and measuring the amount of gypsum in the excreta. Mannitol was the strongest activator of T. castaneum dietary intake. In a Xenopus oocyte expression, TcGr20 was found to be responsible for mannitol and sorbitol responses, but not for responses to other tested non-volatile compounds. The EC50 values of TcGr20 for mannitol and sorbitol were 72.6 mM and 90.6 mM, respectively, suggesting that TcGr20 is a feasible receptor for the recognition of mannitol at lower concentrations. We used RNAi and the TribUTE assay to examine whether TcGr20 expression was involved in mannitol recognition. The amounts of excreta in TcGr20 dsRNA-injected adults decreased significantly, despite the presence of mannitol, compared to control adults. Taken together, our results indicate that T. castaneum adults recognized mannitol/sorbitol using the TcGr20 receptor, thereby facilitating the dietary intake of these compounds.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
29023543
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC5638539 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One
Fig 1. Establishment of feeding assay in T. castaneum adults using gypsum block.The starved T. castaneum adults show in a series of the behavior from recognition, eating to excretion the gypsum diet. Scale bars: 1 mm. A. The adult beetle bit gypsum. The gypsum was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB). B, B’. Digestive tract of adult beetle with the CBB staining gypsum (B) and without the CBB staining (B’). C. Excreta of the CBB staining gypsum by T. castaneum (arrowheads). D. The assessment of the effect of sexual differences in gypsum intake. T. castaneum adult beetles were individually fed on sweetener-free gypsum blocks for 48 h. The amount of excreta was measured using microbalance. Each plot represents the amount of excreta of adult beetles in individuals (n = 10). Standard error bars show S.E.M. Statistical analyses were performed Mann-Whitney U test (P = 0.26). “ns” not significant. Total numbers are 20. The results presented are representative of three separate experiments. E. The effect of gypsum intake with sugar or sugar alcohol mixture. Each sugar/sugar alcohol at 200 mM was contained in the gypsum block. T. castaneum adults fed on the artificial diet for 48 h. Each plot represents the amount of excreta of adult beetles in individuals (n = 10). Standard error bars show S.E.M. The results presented are representative of several separate experiments. Statistical analyses were performed Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn’s multiple comparison test (“***” P ≤ 0.001, “****” P ≤ 0.0001, “ns” not significant). Sorbitol, Sor; Trehalose. Tre; Glucose, Glu; Maltose, Mal; Sucrose, Suc; Fructose, Fru; Mannitol. Man. Total numbers are 80, and number of comparison family is 28.
Fig 2. Phylogenetic analysis of deduced amino acid sequences of T. castaneum Gr genes.Amino acid sequence alignment was generated using ClustalW, and the unrooted tree of T. castaneum Grs was conducted by neighbor-joining method in MEGA ver. 7 [25]. The percentage of replicate trees are shown in the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test of 500 replicates. The scale bar represents 0.2 substitutions per amino acid site. Amino acid sequences of B. mori and T. castaneum Grs were obtained from [9, 14], respectively. The amino acid sequences of fructose receptor, HarmGr4 from Helicoverpa armigera, DmGr43 derived from Drosophila melanogaster, were obtained from the NCBI public database.
Fig 3. Current recording of Xenopus oocytes expressing TcGr20.A. Inward current response of Xenopus oocytes expressing TcGr20 to candidate tastants (arrowheads). Tastants were tested at 200 mM. B. The current of water-injected oocytes to same tastants were also recorded. The current data are representative of recordings independently performed in several times.
Fig 4. Ligand dose-dependent response of TcGr20.Two-electrode voltage clamp recordings of TcGr20-expressing Xenopus oocytes. A–B. Inward current response of TcGr20-expressing oocytes with a range of 20 to 400 mM mannitol (A), and 40 to 230 mM sorbitol (B). Each arrowhead represents various concentrations. C–D. Curves were fitted with a standard slope, and EC50 values were calculated for mannitol (C) and sorbitol (D), respectively. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3).
Fig 5. Tissue expression of TcGr20.The relative expression level of the TcGr20 in different tissues was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. TcGr20 expression in male (A) and female (B). An, antennae; H, head; T, thorax; Ab, abdomen and L, legs. Relative expression was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. Ribosomal protein S3 (RpS3) in T. castaneum was used as the control to normalize the amount of templates. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3). Statistical analyses were performed one-way ANOVA (A. F (DFn, DFd) F (4, 10) = 14.17, P = 0.0004; B. F (DFn, DFd) F (4, 10) = 163.8, P < 0.0001) and the post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Columns labeled with the same letters indicate not significant difference (P > 0.05).
Fig 6. Concentration response of mannitol and sorbitol in TribUTE assay.The dose effect of gypsum intake with sugar alcohol mixture. A. mannitol; B. sorbitol. Sugar alcohols at various concentrations were contained in the gypsum block. T. castaneum adults fed on the gypsum for 48 h. Scatter plot represents the amount of excretion of adult beetles in individuals (n = 6). Standard error bars show S.E.M. The results presented are representative of three separate experiments. Statistical analyses were performed Kruskal-Wallis test (A. “***” P = 0.0002, n = 24; B. “***” P = 0.0002, n = 24) and Dunn's multiple comparisons test (“*” P ≤ 0.05, “**” P ≤ 0.01, “***” P ≤ 0.001, “ns” not significant).
Fig 7. TribUTE assay in TcGr20-silencing T. castaneum.A. Knockdown of TcGr20 using the injection of the dsRNA into the starved adult beetles. The Eluc-dsRNA was injected as a control. TcGr20 expression levels of whole body were examined at 48 h after the dsRNA injection. Standard error bars show S.E.M. Statistical significance was determined by t-test (P = 0.0006). B. Effect of gypsum intake supplemented with 100 mM mannitol. The gypsum in the presence of 100 mM mannitol was given to the TcGr20- and Eluc-dsRNA-injected adult beetle individuals at 48 h after dsRNA injection, respectively for 48 h. The amount of excreta was measured using microbalance. Each plot represents the amount of excreta of adult beetles in individuals (n = 24). Standard error bars show S.E.M. Statistical significance was determined by t-test (“****” P ≤ 0.0001).
Abdel-Latief,
A family of chemoreceptors in Tribolium castaneum (Tenebrionidae: Coleoptera).
2007, Pubmed
Abdel-Latief,
A family of chemoreceptors in Tribolium castaneum (Tenebrionidae: Coleoptera).
2007,
Pubmed
Alabi,
Identification of taste receptors and proteomic characterization of the antenna and legs of Tribolium brevicornis, a stored food product pest.
2014,
Pubmed
Briscoe,
Female behaviour drives expression and evolution of gustatory receptors in butterflies.
2013,
Pubmed
Dahanukar,
A Gr receptor is required for response to the sugar trehalose in taste neurons of Drosophila.
2001,
Pubmed
Dippel,
Morphological and Transcriptomic Analysis of a Beetle Chemosensory System Reveals a Gnathal Olfactory Center.
2016,
Pubmed
Dus,
Taste-independent detection of the caloric content of sugar in Drosophila.
2011,
Pubmed
Ghaffar,
Brown planthopper (N. lugens Stal) feeding behaviour on rice germplasm as an indicator of resistance.
2011,
Pubmed
Glendinning,
How do inositol and glucose modulate feeding in Manduca sexta caterpillars?
2000,
Pubmed
Isono,
Molecular and cellular designs of insect taste receptor system.
2010,
Pubmed
Ja,
Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay.
2007,
Pubmed
Jiang,
A gustatory receptor tuned to D-fructose in antennal sensilla chaetica of Helicoverpa armigera.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Joseph,
Drosophila Chemoreceptors: A Molecular Interface Between the Chemical World and the Brain.
2015,
Pubmed
Kikawada,
Trehalose transporter 1, a facilitated and high-capacity trehalose transporter, allows exogenous trehalose uptake into cells.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kikuta,
Characterization of a ligand-gated cation channel based on an inositol receptor in the silkworm, Bombyx mori.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kim,
BeetleBase in 2010: revisions to provide comprehensive genomic information for Tribolium castaneum.
2010,
Pubmed
Kumar,
MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets.
2016,
Pubmed
Ling,
The molecular and cellular basis of taste coding in the legs of Drosophila.
2014,
Pubmed
Lord,
Evaluation of quantitative PCR reference genes for gene expression studies in Tribolium castaneum after fungal challenge.
2010,
Pubmed
Lushchak,
Specific dietary carbohydrates differentially influence the life span and fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster.
2014,
Pubmed
Meena,
Mannitol metabolism during pathogenic fungal-host interactions under stressed conditions.
2015,
Pubmed
Miller,
Dissecting systemic RNA interference in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum: parameters affecting the efficiency of RNAi.
2012,
Pubmed
Moon,
A taste receptor required for the caffeine response in vivo.
2006,
Pubmed
Niu,
Analysis of volatiles from stored wheat and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) with solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography mass spectrometry.
2016,
Pubmed
Park,
Heterogeneous expression of Drosophila gustatory receptors in enteroendocrine cells.
2011,
Pubmed
Richards,
The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum.
2008,
Pubmed
Sang,
Evaluation of Reference Genes for RT-qPCR in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Under UVB Stress.
2015,
Pubmed
Sato,
Sugar-regulated cation channel formed by an insect gustatory receptor.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Witteveen,
Polyol pools in Aspergillus niger.
1995,
Pubmed
Xu,
Expansion of a bitter taste receptor family in a polyphagous insect herbivore.
2016,
Pubmed