XB-ART-53309
DNA Repair (Amst)
2015 Aug 01;32:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.04.026.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity.
Cortez D
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Billions of base pairs of DNA must be replicated trillions of times in a human lifetime. Complete and accurate replication once and only once per cell division cycle is essential to maintain genome integrity and prevent disease. Impediments to replication fork progression including difficult to replicate DNA sequences, conflicts with transcription, and DNA damage further add to the genome maintenance challenge. These obstacles frequently cause fork stalling, but only rarely cause a failure to complete replication. Robust mechanisms ensure that stalled forks remain stable and capable of either resuming DNA synthesis or being rescued by converging forks. However, when failures do happen the fork collapses leading to genome rearrangements, cell death and disease. Despite intense interest, the mechanisms to repair damaged replication forks, stabilize them, and ensure successful replication remain only partly understood. Different models of fork collapse have been proposed with varying descriptions of what happens to the DNA and replisome. Here, I will define fork collapse and describe what is known about how the replication checkpoint prevents it to maintain genome stability.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 25957489
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC4522347
???displayArticle.link??? DNA Repair (Amst)
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]
Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
References [+] :
Achar,
Coordinated protein and DNA remodeling by human HLTF on stalled replication fork.
2011, Pubmed
Achar, Coordinated protein and DNA remodeling by human HLTF on stalled replication fork. 2011, Pubmed
Ager, Measurement of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. 1990, Pubmed
Aguilera, R loops: from transcription byproducts to threats to genome stability. 2012, Pubmed
Alvino, Replication in hydroxyurea: it's a matter of time. 2007, Pubmed
Ammazzalorso, ATR and ATM differently regulate WRN to prevent DSBs at stalled replication forks and promote replication fork recovery. 2010, Pubmed
Anand, Break-induced DNA replication. 2013, Pubmed
Aparicio, Differential assembly of Cdc45p and DNA polymerases at early and late origins of DNA replication. 1999, Pubmed
Bansbach, SMARCAL1 and replication stress: an explanation for SIOD? 2010, Pubmed
Bansbach, The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. 2009, Pubmed
Bensimon, Alignment and sensitive detection of DNA by a moving interface. 1994, Pubmed
Bermejo, Preserving the genome by regulating chromatin association with the nuclear envelope. 2012, Pubmed
Berti, Human RECQ1 promotes restart of replication forks reversed by DNA topoisomerase I inhibition. 2013, Pubmed
Bétous, Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases. 2013, Pubmed
Bétous, Identification and characterization of SMARCAL1 protein complexes. 2013, Pubmed
Bétous, SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. 2012, Pubmed
Bhat, High-affinity DNA-binding domains of replication protein A (RPA) direct SMARCAL1-dependent replication fork remodeling. 2015, Pubmed
Binz, Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage. 2004, Pubmed
Bizard, The dissolution of double Holliday junctions. 2014, Pubmed
Branzei, Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. 2010, Pubmed
Brewer, The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. 1987, Pubmed
Brown, ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. 2000, Pubmed
Byun, Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Calzada, Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. 2005, Pubmed
Carr, DNA replication: failures and inverted fusions. 2011, Pubmed
Ciccia, Polyubiquitinated PCNA recruits the ZRANB3 translocase to maintain genomic integrity after replication stress. 2012, Pubmed
Ciccia, The SIOD disorder protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein involved in replication fork restart. 2009, Pubmed
Cimprich, ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. 2008, Pubmed
Cobb, DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. 2003, Pubmed
Cobb, Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. 2005, Pubmed
Cordeiro-Stone, Analysis of DNA replication forks encountering a pyrimidine dimer in the template to the leading strand. 1999, Pubmed
Cortez, ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. 2001, Pubmed
Cortez, Minichromosome maintenance proteins are direct targets of the ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases. 2004, Pubmed
Cotta-Ramusino, Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. 2005, Pubmed
Couch, ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. 2013, Pubmed , Xenbase
Cox, The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. 2000, Pubmed
Davies, Role for BLM in replication-fork restart and suppression of origin firing after replicative stress. 2007, Pubmed
Davies, Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest. 2004, Pubmed
De Piccoli, Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. 2012, Pubmed
Desany, Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. 1998, Pubmed
Dimitrova, Temporally coordinated assembly and disassembly of replication factories in the absence of DNA synthesis. 2000, Pubmed
Feijoo, Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing. 2001, Pubmed
Follonier, Friedreich's ataxia-associated GAA repeats induce replication-fork reversal and unusual molecular junctions. 2013, Pubmed
Franchitto, Replication fork stalling in WRN-deficient cells is overcome by prompt activation of a MUS81-dependent pathway. 2008, Pubmed
Fugger, FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks. 2015, Pubmed
Gabbai, Recruitment to stalled replication forks of the PriA DNA helicase and replisome-loading activities is essential for survival. 2010, Pubmed
García-Gómez, PrimPol, an archaic primase/polymerase operating in human cells. 2013, Pubmed
Gari, The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. 2008, Pubmed
Gari, Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM. 2008, Pubmed
Ge, Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. 2007, Pubmed
Halazonetis, An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. 2008, Pubmed
Hashimoto, RAD51- and MRE11-dependent reassembly of uncoupled CMG helicase complex at collapsed replication forks. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hu, The intra-S phase checkpoint targets Dna2 to prevent stalled replication forks from reversing. 2012, Pubmed
Ibarra, Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication. 2008, Pubmed
Jackson, Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells. 1998, Pubmed
Katou, S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. 2003, Pubmed
Kolodner, Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 2002, Pubmed
Leman, Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection. 2012, Pubmed
Liu, Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. 2000, Pubmed
Lopes, The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. 2001, Pubmed
López-Contreras, The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage. 2010, Pubmed
Lucca, Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. 2004, Pubmed
Machwe, The Werner and Bloom syndrome proteins help resolve replication blockage by converting (regressed) holliday junctions to functional replication forks. 2011, Pubmed
Machwe, The Werner and Bloom syndrome proteins catalyze regression of a model replication fork. 2006, Pubmed
Malkova, Break-induced replication: functions and molecular mechanism. 2013, Pubmed
Manosas, Direct observation of stalled fork restart via fork regression in the T4 replication system. 2012, Pubmed
Mason, A structure-specific nucleic acid-binding domain conserved among DNA repair proteins. 2014, Pubmed
Masumoto, Dpb11 controls the association between DNA polymerases alpha and epsilon and the autonomously replicating sequence region of budding yeast. 2000, Pubmed
Méchali, Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Meister, Replication foci dynamics: replication patterns are modulated by S-phase checkpoint kinases in fission yeast. 2007, Pubmed
Merrick, Visualization of altered replication dynamics after DNA damage in human cells. 2004, Pubmed
Mourón, Repriming of DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks by human PrimPol. 2013, Pubmed
Murphy, Phosphorylated RPA recruits PALB2 to stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate fork recovery. 2014, Pubmed
Nam, Analysis of mutations that dissociate G(2) and essential S phase functions of human ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase. 2011, Pubmed
Nam, ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork. 2011, Pubmed
Neelsen, Oncogenes induce genotoxic stress by mitotic processing of unusual replication intermediates. 2013, Pubmed
Norio, Visualization of DNA replication on individual Epstein-Barr virus episomes. 2001, Pubmed
Olive, Cell proliferation as a requirement for development of the contact effect in Chinese hamster V79 spheroids. 1989, Pubmed
Opresko, The Werner syndrome helicase/exonuclease processes mobile D-loops through branch migration and degradation. 2009, Pubmed
Paciotti, Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. 2001, Pubmed
Postow, Identification of SMARCAL1 as a component of the DNA damage response. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ragland, RNF4 and PLK1 are required for replication fork collapse in ATR-deficient cells. 2013, Pubmed
Ray Chaudhuri, Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sabatinos, Continued DNA synthesis in replication checkpoint mutants leads to fork collapse. 2012, Pubmed
Sarbajna, Holliday junction processing enzymes as guardians of genome stability. 2014, Pubmed
Segurado, Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. 2008, Pubmed
Sirbu, Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks. 2011, Pubmed
Sogo, Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. 2002, Pubmed
Tatsumi, Production of DNA bifilarly substituted with bromodeoxyuridine in the first round of synthesis: branch migration during isolation of cellular DNA. 1978, Pubmed
Tercero, Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. 2001, Pubmed
Tercero, A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. 2003, Pubmed
Thangavel, DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells. 2015, Pubmed
Toledo, ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. 2013, Pubmed
Trenz, Plx1 is required for chromosomal DNA replication under stressful conditions. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Trenz, ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Woodward, Excess Mcm2-7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yoo, Mcm2 is a direct substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint responses. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yu, Strand-specific analysis shows protein binding at replication forks and PCNA unloading from lagging strands when forks stall. 2014, Pubmed
Yuan, The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks. 2009, Pubmed
Yusufzai, The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA repair sites via an interaction with RPA. 2009, Pubmed
Zellweger, Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells. 2015, Pubmed
Zeman, Causes and consequences of replication stress. 2014, Pubmed
Zhao, A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. 1998, Pubmed