Laha KT et al. (2013), Macroscopic kinetics of pentameric ligand gated...

XB-ART-49870

PLoS One 2013 Jan 01;811:e80322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080322.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Macroscopic kinetics of pentameric ligand gated ion channels: comparisons between two prokaryotic channels and one eukaryotic channel.

Laha KT , Ghosh B , Czajkowski C .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Electrochemical signaling in the brain depends on pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs). Recently, crystal structures of prokaryotic pLGIC homologues from Erwinia chrysanthemi (ELIC) and Gloeobacter violaceus (GLIC) in presumed closed and open channel states have been solved, which provide insight into the structural mechanisms underlying channel activation. Although structural studies involving both ELIC and GLIC have become numerous, thorough functional characterizations of these channels are still needed to establish a reliable foundation for comparing kinetic properties. Here, we examined the kinetics of ELIC and GLIC current activation, desensitization, and deactivation and compared them to the GABAA receptor, a prototypic eukaryotic pLGIC. Outside-out patch-clamp recordings were performed with HEK-293T cells expressing ELIC, GLIC, or α1β2γ2L GABAA receptors, and ultra-fast ligand application was used. In response to saturating agonist concentrations, we found both ELIC and GLIC current activation were two to three orders of magnitude slower than GABAA receptor current activation. The prokaryotic channels also had slower current desensitization on a timescale of seconds. ELIC and GLIC current deactivation following 25 s pulses of agonist (cysteamine and pH 4.0 buffer, respectively) were relatively fast with time constants of 24.9 ± 5.1 ms and 1.2 ± 0.2 ms, respectively. Surprisingly, ELIC currents evoked by GABA activated very slowly with a time constant of 1.3 ± 0.3 s and deactivated even slower with a time constant of 4.6 ± 1.2 s. We conclude that the prokaryotic pLGICs undergo similar agonist-mediated gating transitions to open and desensitized states as eukaryotic pLGICs, supporting their use as experimental models. Their uncharacteristic slow activation, slow desensitization and rapid deactivation time courses are likely due to differences in specific structural elements, whose future identification may help uncover mechanisms underlying pLGIC gating transitions.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 24260369
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC3833957
???displayArticle.link??? PLoS One
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: gabarap

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

	Figure 2. Outside-out patch-clamp recordings from HEK-293T cells expressing GABAARs.A) Current evoked by a 1 second pulse of 10 mM GABA. The current decrease in the presence of agonist (desensitization) and upon agonist washout (deactivation) were fit with bi-exponential functions (red curves) and the weighted time constants for the example trace are shown. B) Current evoked by a 5 millisecond application of 10 mM GABA (black arrow). To the right, expanded traces highlight the current increase during GABA application (activation) and the current deactivation following washout of GABA. The time course of activation was determined by fitting the rising phase with a bi-exponential function (red curve) and the timecoure of deactivation was determined by fitting the current decay after agonist removal with a bi-exponential function (red curve). The weighted time constants for the example traces are shown. The traces shown are the ensemble averages of multiple GABA-evoked currents from a single patch.
	Figure 3. Cysteamine activation of ELIC.Outside-out patch-clamp recordings from HEK-293T cells expressing ELIC. ELIC currents evoked by alternating pulses of 30 mM and 10 mM or 50 mM cysteamine (black bar) are overlaid. Current amplitudes and rise-times evoked by 30 mM and 50 mM cysteamine were similar suggesting 30 mM was saturating.
	Figure 4. ELIC current activation was slow and deactivation fast compared to GABAARs.A) Macroscopic ELIC current evoked by a 2 s application of 30 mM cysteamine (black bar) (left). Expanded views depict current activation (center) and deactivation (right) fit with single exponential functions (red). B) The τ-activations for ELIC currents (30 mM cysteamine) and GABAAR currents (10 mM GABA) are plotted. Data are mean ± SEM (ELIC: n = 9, GABAAR: n = 19). C) The τ-deactivations for ELIC currents evoked by short (2s) and long (25s) pulses of 30 mM and 10 mM cysteamine are plotted. The τw-deactivations for GABAAR currents evoked by 5 ms or 1 s applications of 10 mM GABA are also plotted. GABAAR current deactivation after a 1 s pulse is significantly slower than after a 5 ms pulse (* p<0.001). Data are mean ± SEM (ELIC 30 mM 2 s: n = 9, ELIC 30 mM 25 s: n = 3, ELIC 10 mM 2 s: n = 6, ELIC 10 mM 25 s: n = 4, GABAAR 5 ms: n = 9, GABAAR 1 s: n = 10).
	Figure 5. Macroscopic ELIC current desensitization.A) The desensitization phase of ELIC current evoked by a 25 s pulse of 30 mM cysteamine was fit with a single-exponential function (red curve). B) The τ-desensitization for ELIC currents as measured in (A) and the τw-desensitization for GABAAR currents measured during a 1s application of 10 mM GABA are plotted. Data are mean ± SEM (ELIC: n = 4, GABAAR: n = 10).
	Figure 6. ELIC currents evoked by GABA exhibited unique kinetics.A) ELIC currents evoked by GABA (25 s, 100 mM) exhibited slow current activation, which was fit with a bi-exponential function (red curve). B) Following activation by a 1 s pulse of 100 mM GABA, ELIC current decayed very slowly and was fit with a bi-exponential function (red curve). Each GABA-evoked trace (black) is overlaid with a normalized response to 30 mM cysteamine obtained from a separate patch (gray) to highlight the differences in current activation and deactivation kinetics.
	Figure 7. Proton induced GLIC currents.A) GLIC currents evoked by alternating 2 s jumps from pH 7.6 to the indicated values. Maximal current amplitudes were evoked by pH 4.0. B) A current recorded from an outside-out patch pulled from a mock-transfected HEK-293T cell evoked by pH 4.0 (green) is normalized and overlaid with GLIC currents (black) evoked by pH 4.0 from outside-out patches pulled from two different HEK-293T cells expressing GLIC to highlight differences in macroscopic current desensitization.
	Figure 8. GLIC current activation was slow and deactivation fast compared to GABAARs.A) GLIC currents activated by a 2 s application of pH 4.0 buffer exhibited two different desensitization profiles. In 25 patches, little current desensitization was observed, whereas in 18 patches, a fast component of desensitization was observed. GLIC current activation and deactivation was analyzed separately for each group. Expanded views of current activation and deactivation are shown to the right and fit with bi-exponential functions (red curves). B) The τw-activations for GLIC currents (pH 4.0) from both groups are plotted and compared to the τw-activations of currents obtained from patches from mock-transfected cells (pH 4.0) and from GABAARs (10 mM GABA). Data are mean ± SEM (GLIC no early: n = 25, GLIC w/early: n = 18, Mock: n = 7). C) The τw-deactivations are plotted for both groups of GLIC currents following a 2 s (as shown above) as well as a 25 s pulse of pH 4.0 buffer. The τw-deactivations for GABAAR currents evoked by 5 ms or 1 s applications of 10 mM GABA are also plotted. Data are mean ± SEM (GLIC no early 2 s: n = 11, GLIC no early 25 s: n = 8, GLIC w/early 2 s: n = 6, GLIC w/early 25 s: n = 6).
	Figure 9. GLIC current desensitized slowly.A) GLIC current desensitization during a 25 s pulse of pH 4.0 buffer was fit with a single exponential when there was no early desensitization (left trace, red curve) or a bi-exponential function when early desensitization was present (right trace, red curve). B) Time constants for the fast and slow components of desensitization from both types of GLIC currents (pH 4.0, 25 s) and GABAAR currents (10 mM GABA, 1 s) are plotted. n.a. = not applicable, no measurable fast component. C) The τw-desensitizations for both types of GLIC currents (pH 4.0, 25 s) and the GABAAR (10 mM GABA, 1 s) are plotted. Data are mean ± SEM (GLIC no early: n = 7, GLIC w/early: n = 9, GABAAR: n = 10). D) GLIC current desensitization during a 150 s pulse of pH 4.0 buffer was fit with a single exponential when there was no early desensitization (left trace, red curve) or a bi-exponential function when early desensitization was present (right trace, red curve). E) GLIC current decayed to baseline during an 8 minute pulse of pH 4.0 buffer.
	Figure 1. GABAA receptor, ELIC, and GLIC current responses measured using two-electrode voltage clamp.A) Representative currents from the GABAA receptor, ELIC, and GLIC expressed in oocytes evoked by saturating concentrations of agonist (black bar). B) Concentration response curves for the GABAA receptor, ELIC, and GLIC. CA = cysteamine.

References [+] :

Alqazzaz, Cys-loop receptor channel blockers also block GLIC. 2011, Pubmed

Alqazzaz, Cys-loop receptor channel blockers also block GLIC. 2011, Pubmed
Bianchi, Structural determinants of fast desensitization and desensitization-deactivation coupling in GABAa receptors. 2001, Pubmed
Bocquet, X-ray structure of a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel in an apparently open conformation. 2009, Pubmed
Bocquet, A prokaryotic proton-gated ion channel from the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor family. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Colón-Sáez, The α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor function in hippocampal neurons is regulated by the lipid composition of the plasma membrane. 2011, Pubmed
Dellisanti, Packing of the extracellular domain hydrophobic core has evolved to facilitate pentameric ligand-gated ion channel function. 2011, Pubmed
Gonzalez-Gutierrez, Bridging the gap between structural models of nicotinic receptor superfamily ion channels and their corresponding functional states. 2010, Pubmed
Gonzalez-Gutierrez, Mutations that stabilize the open state of the Erwinia chrisanthemi ligand-gated ion channel fail to change the conformation of the pore domain in crystals. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Grutter, Molecular tuning of fast gating in pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. 2005, Pubmed
Gunthorpe, Characterisation of a human acid-sensing ion channel (hASIC1a) endogenously expressed in HEK293 cells. 2001, Pubmed
Hilf, X-ray structure of a prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel. 2008, Pubmed
Hilf, Structure of a potentially open state of a proton-activated pentameric ligand-gated ion channel. 2009, Pubmed
Howard, Structural basis for alcohol modulation of a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Jones, Desensitized states prolong GABAA channel responses to brief agonist pulses. 1995, Pubmed
Lewis, Kinetic determinants of agonist action at the recombinant human glycine receptor. 2003, Pubmed
Mott, Open probability of homomeric murine 5-HT3A serotonin receptors depends on subunit occupancy. 2001, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mozrzymas, Binding sites, singly bound states, and conformation coupling shape GABA-evoked currents. 2003, Pubmed
Noda, Cloning and sequence analysis of calf cDNA and human genomic DNA encoding alpha-subunit precursor of muscle acetylcholine receptor. , Pubmed
Parikh, Structure of the M2 transmembrane segment of GLIC, a prokaryotic Cys loop receptor homologue from Gloeobacter violaceus, probed by substituted cysteine accessibility. 2011, Pubmed
Petrini, Declusterization of GABAA receptors affects the kinetic properties of GABAergic currents in cultured hippocampal neurons. 2003, Pubmed
Scheller, Coupled and uncoupled gating and desensitization effects by pore domain mutations in GABA(A) receptors. 2002, Pubmed
Shu, Slow actions of neuroactive steroids at GABAA receptors. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Solt, Differential effects of serotonin and dopamine on human 5-HT3A receptor kinetics: interpretation within an allosteric kinetic model. 2007, Pubmed
Spurny, Pentameric ligand-gated ion channel ELIC is activated by GABA and modulated by benzodiazepines. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Tasneem, Identification of the prokaryotic ligand-gated ion channels and their implications for the mechanisms and origins of animal Cys-loop ion channels. 2005, Pubmed
Thompson, The pharmacological profile of ELIC, a prokaryotic GABA-gated receptor. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Velisetty, Desensitization mechanism in prokaryotic ligand-gated ion channel. 2012, Pubmed
Venkatachalan, Optimized expression vector for ion channel studies in Xenopus oocytes and mammalian cells using alfalfa mosaic virus. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Weng, Anesthetic sensitivity of the Gloeobacter violaceus proton-gated ion channel. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Zimmermann, Inhibition of the prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel ELIC by divalent cations. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Zimmermann, Ligand activation of the prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel ELIC. 2011, Pubmed