Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Chromosome position at the spindle equator is regulated by chromokinesin and a bipolar microtubule array.
Takagi J
,
Itabashi T
,
Suzuki K
,
Ishiwata S
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The chromosome alignment is mediated by polar ejection and poleward forces acting on the chromosome arm and kinetochores, respectively. Although components of the motile machinery such as chromokinesin have been characterized, their dynamics within the spindle is poorly understood. Here we show that a quantum dot (Qdot) binding up to four Xenopus chromokinesin (Xkid) molecules behaved like a nanosize chromosome arm in the meiotic spindle, which is self-organized in cytoplasmic egg extracts. Xkid-Qdots travelled long distances along microtubules by changing several tracks, resulting in their accumulation toward and distribution around the metaphase plate. The analysis indicated that the direction of motion and velocity depend on the distribution of microtubule polarity within the spindle. Thus, this mechanism is governed by chromokinesin motors, which is dependent on symmetrical microtubule orientation that may allow chromosomes to maintain their position around the spindle equator until correct microtubule-kinetochore attachment is established.
Figure 1. Analysis of Xkid-Qdot movement within the meiotic spindle.(a) Localization of Xkid-GFP-FL and Xkid-GFP-FL-T125N in the metaphase spindle in self-organized in Xenopus egg extracts. The Xkid constructs are shown in green. TMR- bovine brain tubulin and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were added to visualize microtubules (red) and DNA (blue), respectively. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (b) Localization and motion of Xkid-Qdots (green or yellow, when merged with red) in the spindle. Arrows indicate Xkid-Qdots moving on the spindle microtubules (red). The right panel shows a kymograph of Xkid-Qdots motion along the pole-to-pole axis of the spindle depicted on the left panels. Scale bars represent 10 μm and 100 s. (c) Trajectories of Xkid-Qdots in the spindle. Open circles indicate the initial position of trajectory.
Figure 2. Xkid-Qdots traverse long distances towards the spindle equator.(a) Schematic of the analysis of Xkid-Qdot motion. Xkid-Qdot motion was categorized into the three modes, Equator (E), Pole (P) and E-P, by the direction of movement along the pole-to-pole axis of spindle, and was analysed by calculating instantaneous velocity, run length, and lifetime in each mode, total run length, and total lifetime in each Qdot (see Methods). (b) Time course of the motion of Xkid-Qdots along the pole-to-pole axis of the spindle (n = 2 Qdots; red, equator mode; blue, pole mode; green, E-P mode). (c) Histograms of total run lengths and lifetimes for Xkid-Qdots (n = 9 spindles, 170 Qdots). The indicated average total run length (L) and average total lifetime (t) were determined by fitting the data to single exponentials excluding the first bin. (d) Histograms of instantaneous velocity for Xkid-Qdots in each mode fitted to a single Gaussian distribution (n = 9 spindles, 170 Qdots). (e) Average instantaneous velocity, run length and lifetime for Xkid-Qdots in each mode obtained by Gaussian or exponential fitting (mean ± s.e.m., data are shown in Supplementary Table S1, see also (d) and Supplementary Fig. S1e, f). Asterisks indicate the result of t- and the Mann-Whitney U tests (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. The motion and direction of movement of Xkid-Qdots depend on the position in the spindle along the pole-to-pole axis.Spatial distribution of Xkid-Qdots and their motion along the pole-to-pole axis. (a) Histogram of the spatial distribution of Xkid-Qdots at each time point (red, equator mode; blue, pole mode; green, E-P mode) (n = 9 spindles, 170 Qdots, 5,234 time points) and DNA distribution along the pole-to-pole axis (mean ± s.e.m.; blue, n = 7 spindles) as a function of the distance from equator (AU). (b) Spatial distribution of the mode of motion along the pole-to-pole axis (red, equator mode; blue, pole mode; green, E-P mode) shown in (a). Each region represents at least 100 time points. (c) Spatial distribution of the instantaneous velocity along the pole-to-pole axis (mean ± s.e.m.; red, equator mode; blue, pole mode; green, E-P mode). Data with statistical significance (p) are shown in Supplementary Table S2, see also Supplementary Fig. S3a. (d) Spatial distribution of the run length and lifetime along the pole-to-pole axis (mean ± s.e.m.; red, equator mode; blue, pole mode; green, E-P mode). Data are shown in Supplementary Table S2, see also Supplementary Fig. S3b, c.
Figure 4. Xkid-Qdots accumulate towards the plus ends of microtubules in the spindle-like microtubule structure.The monopolar microtubule structure ((a)–(c), n = 12 spindles, 569 Qdots, 12,362 time points) and the spindle-like bipolar structure ((d)–(f), n = 1 spindle, 518 Qdots, 13,792 time points) were formed in the presence of 200 μM monastrol. (a) Localization and motion of Xkid-Qdots (green) in the monopolar microtubule structure (red). The right panel shows a kymograph of Xkid-Qdot motion in a region depicted in the left panel (white dashed box) along the white arrow. (b) Histogram of spatial distribution of Xkid-Qdots in the monopolar microtubule structure for each time point from the pole to outward (red, outward mode; blue, pole mode; green, O-P mode). (c) Spatial distribution of the mode of motion in the monopolar microtubule structure from the pole to outward (red, outward mode; blue, pole mode; green, O-P mode). Each region represents at least 100 time points. (d) Localization and movement of Xkid-Qdots (green) in the spindle-like bipolar assembly of a pair of monopolar microtubule structures (red). The right panel shows a kymograph of Xkid-Qdots in a region depicted in the left panel (white dashed box) along the white arrow. (e) Histogram of spatial distribution of Xkid-Qdots in the spindle-like bipolar structure at each time point along the axis perpendicular to the blue dashed line in the left panel of (d) (red, outward mode; blue, pole mode; green, O-P mode). (f) Spatial distribution of the mode of motion in the spindle-like bipolar structure along the axis perpendicular to the blue dashed line in the left panel of (d) (red, outward mode; blue, pole mode; green, O-P mode). Each region represents at least 100 time points. (g) Schematic showing Xkid-Qdot motion along the spindle's symmetrically ordered microtubule structure. Xkid-Qdot movement along the spindle is indicated by yellow circles, and their size represents the probability of each directional movement. Dashed and solid lines represent the proportion of polarity and average length of microtubules derived from each spindle pole (red and blue), respectively. Scale bars in (a) and (d) represent 10 μm and 100 s.
Antonio,
Xkid, a chromokinesin required for chromosome alignment on the metaphase plate.
2000, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Antonio,
Xkid, a chromokinesin required for chromosome alignment on the metaphase plate.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bieling,
Microtubule motility on reconstituted meiotic chromatin.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Brugués,
Nucleation and transport organize microtubules in metaphase spindles.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Castoldi,
Chromokinesin Xklp1 contributes to the regulation of microtubule density and organization during spindle assembly.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Desai,
The use of Xenopus egg extracts to study mitotic spindle assembly and function in vitro.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dumont,
Acentrosomal spindle assembly and chromosome segregation during oocyte meiosis.
2012,
Pubmed
Funabiki,
The Xenopus chromokinesin Xkid is essential for metaphase chromosome alignment and must be degraded to allow anaphase chromosome movement.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gatlin,
Directly probing the mechanical properties of the spindle and its matrix.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Heald,
Spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts: respective roles of centrosomes and microtubule self-organization.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hyman,
Preparation of modified tubulins.
1991,
Pubmed
Kapoor,
Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kapoor,
Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation.
2006,
Pubmed
Kitajima,
Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes.
2011,
Pubmed
Levesque,
The chromokinesin Kid is necessary for chromosome arm orientation and oscillation, but not congression, on mitotic spindles.
2001,
Pubmed
Magidson,
The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly.
2011,
Pubmed
Mazumdar,
Chromokinesins: multitalented players in mitosis.
2005,
Pubmed
McIntosh,
Biophysics of mitosis.
2012,
Pubmed
Meunier,
Microtubule assembly during mitosis - from distinct origins to distinct functions?
2012,
Pubmed
Ohsugi,
Kid-mediated chromosome compaction ensures proper nuclear envelope formation.
2008,
Pubmed
Perez,
Xkid chromokinesin is required for the meiosis I to meiosis II transition in Xenopus laevis oocytes.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Rajagopalan,
Aneuploidy and cancer.
2004,
Pubmed
Rieder,
Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle.
1986,
Pubmed
Rieder,
Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle.
1994,
Pubmed
Scholey,
Cell division.
2003,
Pubmed
Shimamoto,
Insights into the micromechanical properties of the metaphase spindle.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shiroguchi,
The second microtubule-binding site of monomeric kid enhances the microtubule affinity.
2003,
Pubmed
Stumpff,
Kif18A and chromokinesins confine centromere movements via microtubule growth suppression and spatial control of kinetochore tension.
2012,
Pubmed
Tokai-Nishizumi,
The chromokinesin Kid is required for maintenance of proper metaphase spindle size.
2005,
Pubmed
Tseng,
Dual detection of chromosomes and microtubules by the chromosomal passenger complex drives spindle assembly.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walczak,
Mechanisms of mitotic spindle assembly and function.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walczak,
Mechanisms of chromosome behaviour during mitosis.
2010,
Pubmed
Wandke,
Human chromokinesins promote chromosome congression and spindle microtubule dynamics during mitosis.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yajima,
The human chromokinesin Kid is a plus end-directed microtubule-based motor.
2003,
Pubmed
Yang,
Regional variation of microtubule flux reveals microtubule organization in the metaphase meiotic spindle.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase