Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Channels (Austin)
2010 Jan 01;41:22-41. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.1.10481.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Block of mouse Slo1 and Slo3 K+ channels by CTX, IbTX, TEA, 4-AP and quinidine.
Tang QY
,
Zhang Z
,
Xia XM
,
Lingle CJ
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
pH-regulated Slo3 channels, perhaps exclusively expressed in mammalian sperm, may play a role in alkalization-mediated K(+) fluxes associated with sperm capacitation. The Slo3 channel shares extensive homology with Ca(2+)- and voltage-regulated BK-type Slo1 K(+) channels. Here, using heterologous expression in oocytes, we define distinctive differences in pharmacological properties of Slo3 and Slo1 currents, examine blockade in terms of distinct blocking models, and, for some blockers, use mutated constructs to evaluate determinants of block. Slo3 is resistant to block by the standard Slo1 blockers, iberiotoxin, charybdotoxin and extracellular TEA. Slo3 is relatively insensitive to extracellular 4-AP up to 100 mM, while Slo1 is blocked in a voltage-dependent fashion consistent with block on the extracellular side of the channel. Block of both Slo1 and Slo3 by cytosolic 4-AP can be described by open channel block, with Slo3 being approximately 10-15-fold more sensitive, but exhibiting weaker voltage-dependence of block. The cytosolic concentrations of 4-AP required to block Slo3 make it unlikely that the effects of 4-AP on volume regulation in mammalian sperm is mediated by Slo3. Quinidine was more effective in blocking Slo3 than Slo1. For Slo1, quinidine block was favored by depolarization, irrespective of the side of application. For Slo3, quinidine block was relieved by depolarization, irrespective of the side of application, with strong block by less than 10 microM quinidine at potentials near 0 mV. The unusual voltage-dependence of block of Slo3 by quinidine may result from preferential binding of quinidine to closed Slo3 channels. The quinidine concentrations effective in blocking Slo3 suggest, that in experiments that have examined quinidine effects on sperm, any Slo3 currents would be almost completely inhibited.
Figure 1. Slo3 is insensitive to block by CTX and IbTX. In (A), traces show block by cumulative application of CTX to an outside-out patch, with currents activated with 10 um Ca2+ at +120 mV. Cartoon on the top diagrams the Slo1 topology showing transmembrane segments and the cytosolic domain. In (B), 100 nM CTX is without effect on currents through the Slo3 surrogate construct, MC13. Currents were activated with a pipette saline of pH 8.2 with a depolarizing voltage step to +220 mV. The cartoon shows the MC13 topology with red elements originating from Slo3 and black elements from Slo1. See Methods for precise segment boundaries. In (C), Slo1 G/V curves are shown for different CTX concentrations. Red lines correspond to a fit of a state-independent blocking scheme (Scheme 2a) with Kb = 6.1 ± 0.3 nM and no voltage-dependence during the time of each voltage-step. In (D), the effect of 20 and 100 nM CTX on MC13 G/V curves is shown. In (E), traces shown Slo1 currents during progressive increases in IbTX concentration to an outside-out patch with 10 μM pipette Ca2+ and activation steps to +150 mV. For comparison to other studies, fitting the fractional block of current by IbTX for values at +40 mV with a Hill equation yields a Kd = 0.5 ± 0.3 nM (nH = 1). In (F), MC13 currents are insensitive to application of 25 and 100 nM IbTX to an outside-out patch (activation with pipette pH of 8.5 at +180 mV).
Figure 2. Slo1 CTX sensitivity arises primarily from Y294 with small contributions from other elements in the turret segment. In (A), traces show the lack of effect of 100 nM CTX on currents through construct MC6 (inset), in which the Slo1 P-loop is replaced with Slo3 sequence. In (B), G/V curves for MC6 activated with 10 μM Ca2+ are shown in the absence and presence of CTX. Red lines correspond to fits of a simple Boltzman function. In (C), traces show the lack of effect of 100 nM CTX on construct MC18, in which the 2nd half of the P-loop (selectivity filter and pore helix) were replaced with Slo3 sequence. In (D), G/V curves for the MC18 construct activated with 10 μM Ca2+ are shown. In (E), traces show that CTX readily blocks currents through construct MC8, in which the first half of the P-loop (primarily presumed turrent sequence) was replaced with Slo3 sequence. In (F), G/V curves for MC8 activated with 10 μM Ca2+ are shown at different CTX concentrations. Red lines correspond to the best fit of a state-independent blocking model (Scheme 2) with Kb = 10.4 ± 0.3 nM. In (G), traces show weak blocking effects of CTX on currents through Slo1-Y294V. In (H), effects of CTX on the Slo1-Y294V G/V curves are plotted for 10 μM Ca2+.
Figure 3. The Slo3 surrogate, MC13, is relatively insensitive to block by extracellular TEA in comparison to Slo1. In (A), application of TEA to outside-out patches inhibits Slo1 current. In (B), the effect of TEA on the Slo1 G/V curve generated with 300 μM pipette Ca2+ is shown. The solid lines are the best fit of a state-independent blocking model (Kb = 173.9 ± 8.0 μM; zδ = 0.23 ± 0.02 e). Block is relieved with depolarization. In (C), traces show weak blocking effects of extracellular TEA on MC13 currents in outside-out patches. In (D), extracellular TEA has minimal effect on MC13 G/V curves. In (E), mutation of Y294V in Slo1 abolishes most of the sensitivity of Slo1 to TEA. In (F), G/V curves summarize the lack of effect of TEA on the Slo1-Y294V construct.
Figure 4. MC13 is more sensitive than Slo1 to block by cytosolic TEA. In (A), traces show Slo1 current activated at +80 mV with 300 μM Ca2+ in the indicated concentrations of cytosolic TEA. In (B), G/V curves are shown for set of 4–5 patches with the lines showing the best fit of an open channel blocking model (Kb = 49.0 ± 3.2 μM; zδ = -0.15 ± 0.02 e). In (C), traces show MC13 currents activated with pH 8.5 at +280 mV at the indicated cytosolic TEA concentrations. In (D), G/V curves are shown for a set of 6 patches with the lines showing the best fit of an open channel block model (Kb = 0.11 ± 0.01 μM; zδ = 0.12 ± 0.01 e, with the maximal fractional conductance at +300 mV assumed to be 0.35,5,6). A state-independent model did not fit as well (see text and Suppl. Fig. 3).
Scheme 2.
Figure 5. MC13 is relatively insensitive to block by extracellular 4-AP compared to block of Slo1. In (A), Slo1 currents were activated in outside-out patches by the indicated voltage-protocol with 300 μM Ca2+ (pH 8.5) inside the recording pipette. Application of 25 and 100 mM 4-AP resulted in substantial block of outward BK current. In the presence of 4-AP, activation at +100 mV is noticeably slowed, consistent with time-dependent unblock. In contrast, tail currents at -100 mV (red trace) in the presence of 4-AP decay more rapidly than in the absence of 4-AP and exhibit more block at the negative potentials. The pH of the extracellular solution was 7.0. In (B), G/V curves from traces such as those in (A) were generated from steady-state currents. Red lines are the best fit of the open channel block scheme with Kb(0) = 5.19 ± 0.41 mM and zδ = 0.60 ± 0.03 e, consistent with a relief from block at more positive cytosolic voltages. In (C), MC13 currents were activated by the indicated voltage-protocol with the pipette solution at pH 8.5. 4-AP was much less effective in blocking MC13 than BK currents. In (D), G-V curves for MC13 currents were generated again revealing the relative lack of effect of extracellular 4-AP on MC13.
Figure 6. Cytosolic 4-AP blocks Slo3/MC13 more effectively than it blocks Slo1. In (A), G/V curves were generated for Slo1 currents activated with 300 μM Ca2+ (pH 8.5) in inside-out patches with various concentrations of 4-AP. Red lines are the best fit of Scheme 2a, the state-independent block model, with Kb = 30.7 ± 1.3 mM with zδ = 0.1 ± 0.02 e. In (B), G/V curves were generated for Slo3 currents activated with pH 8.5 and fit with Scheme 1, the open channel block model (Kb = 2.5 ± 0.5 mM with zδ = 0.02 ± 0.03 e. In (C), G/V curves were generated for MC13 currents activated in inside-out patches with pH 8.5 and fit with Scheme 1 (Kb = 2.1 ± 0.2 with zδ = 0.02 ± 0.01 e).
Figure 7. Comparison of block of BK currents by 4-AP at pH 7.0 and 8.5. In (A), currents activated with 300 μM Ca2+ at +100 mV by the indicated voltage protocol are compared for different 4-AP concentrations at pH 7.0. The trace for 50 mM 4-AP exhibits greater than 50% block at +100 mV with almost full and instantaneous recovery during the tail current at -100 mV. In (B), currents from the same patch as in (A) were activated as in (A) except at pH 8.5. The trace at 50 mM 4-AP shows strong block at +100 mV, with less complete recovery from block during the tail current in comparison to currents at pH 7.0. In (C and D), G-V curves at plotted for different concentrations of 4-AP either for pH 7.0 (C) or 8.5 (D). In (C), lines correspond to the best fit of Scheme 1a to all points for pH 7.0 yielding Kb = 58.3 ± 3.3 mM with zδ = 0.18 ± 0.02 e. In (D), similarly for pH 8.5, Scheme 1a yielded Kbo = 24.9 ± 2.6 mM with zδ = 0.05 ± 0.06 e. However, at pH 8.5, the state-independent Scheme 2a yielded a better fit than Scheme 1a, with Kbo= Kbc = 31.0 ± 2.7 mM with zδ = 0.11 ± 0.03 e, while for pH 7.0 Scheme 2a yielded a poorer fit than Scheme 1a. In (E), the G/V curves obtained at both pH 7.0 (left) and pH 8.5 (right) were fit simultaneously with Scheme 3, which assumes two independent 4-AP blocking sites, one for the uncharged non-protonated species defined by binding constant Kb(u) and a voltage-dependent site sensitive to protonated 4-AP defined by binding constant Kb(p). Best fit values for the three free parameters were Kb(u) = 9.07 ± 0.46 mM, Kb(p) = 63.5 ± 3.8 mM, and z(p) = 0.19 ± 0.02 e.
Scheme 3.
Figure 8. Block of Slo1 by extracellular or intracellular quinidine is increased by depolarization. In (A), the indicated voltage-protocol was used to elicit Slo1 currents activated with a cytosolic solution containing 300 μM Ca2+ at pH 8.5. Each trace was with a different concentration of extracellular quinidine (pH 7.0). In (B), G/V curves for Slo1 current activation in the presence and absence of quinidine exhibit increased block at more positive potentials. Red lines correspond to the fit of Eqn. 1 with Kb(0) = 0.95 ± 0.02 mM (zδ = 0.05 + 0.01 e). In (C), tail currents following repolarization are shown on an expanded time base for the control trace and 2 mM quinidine trace (red) from (A), revealing rapid unblock upon repolariztion. In (D), traces show Slo1 currents in an inside-out patch activated with the indicated voltage-protocol with 300 μM cytosolic Ca2+ at pH 8.5 and the indicated quinidine concentrations. In (E), G/V curves for Slo1 currents with various quinidine concentrations are plotted along with a fit of Scheme 1, an open-channel block model, with Kb(0) = 142.9 + 3.4 μM (zδ = 0.18 ± 0.01 e). In F, traces are tail currents from (D) for control and 500 μM quinidine solutions. The fractional reduction of peak instantaneous current at -100 mV is reduced relative to the fractional reduction of steady-state current at +100 mV. In (G), Slo1 G/V curves were generated from inside-out patches with 10 μM Ca2+ at pH 7.0 and the indicated quinidine concentrations with the best fit of Eqn. 1 yielding Kb(0) = 92.8 ± 9.8 μM with zδ = 0.11 ± 0.03 e.
Figure 9. Block of MC13 by either extracellular or intracellular quinidine shows a similar relief with depolarization. In (A), MC13 currents were activated in an outside-out patch with the indicated voltage-protocol with a pipette saline of pH 8.5. Quinidine (pH 7.0) was applied to the extracellular side of the patch. In (B), G/V curves for MC13 currents activated in various quinidine concentrations show relief of block at more positive potentials, particularly at higher quinidine concentrations. Lines correspond to a fit of Eqn. 2 (Scheme 2a; state-independent channel block) with Kb = 11.42 ± 1.44 μM (zδ = 0.13 ± 0.01 e from the outside). In (C), traces show MC13 currents activated in an inside-out patch at pH 8.5 with the indicated quinidine concentrations. In (D), G/V curves from MC13 currents are plotted for the indicated quinidine concentrations. Lines show the best fit with Scheme 2a, a state-independent blocking model, with Kb = 1.97 ± 0.34 μM with zδ = 0.13 ± 0.02 e. In (E), traces are tail currents from (C) for control and 25 μM quinidine solutions, highlighting persistence of block with repolarization. In (F), G/V curves for MC13 currents obtained in inside-out patches at pH 8.2 with various quinidine concentrations are shown, with the best fit (Eqn. 2) yielding Kb(0) = 0.98 ± 0.03 μM, with zδ constrained to 0.13 e.
Barfield,
The effects of putative K+ channel blockers on volume regulation of murine spermatozoa.
2005, Pubmed
Barfield,
The effects of putative K+ channel blockers on volume regulation of murine spermatozoa.
2005,
Pubmed
Barfield,
Characterization of potassium channels involved in volume regulation of human spermatozoa.
2005,
Pubmed
Blatz,
Ion conductance and selectivity of single calcium-activated potassium channels in cultured rat muscle.
1984,
Pubmed
Brelidze,
Protons block BK channels by competitive inhibition with K+ and contribute to the limits of unitary currents at high voltages.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Candia,
Mode of action of iberiotoxin, a potent blocker of the large conductance Ca(2+)-activated K+ channel.
1992,
Pubmed
Doi,
Subunit-specific inhibition of inward-rectifier K+ channels by quinidine.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fedida,
Gating charge and ionic currents associated with quinidine block of human Kv1.5 delayed rectifier channels.
1997,
Pubmed
Galvez,
Purification and characterization of a unique, potent, peptidyl probe for the high conductance calcium-activated potassium channel from venom of the scorpion Buthus tamulus.
1990,
Pubmed
Giangiacomo,
Mechanism of iberiotoxin block of the large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel from bovine aortic smooth muscle.
1992,
Pubmed
Giangiacomo,
Synthetic charybdotoxin-iberiotoxin chimeric peptides define toxin binding sites on calcium-activated and voltage-dependent potassium channels.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Giangiacomo,
Functional reconstitution of the large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channel purified from bovine aortic smooth muscle.
1995,
Pubmed
Giangiacomo,
Novel alpha-KTx sites in the BK channel and comparative sequence analysis reveal distinguishing features of the BK and KV channel outer pore.
2008,
Pubmed
Goldstein,
Mechanism of charybdotoxin block of a voltage-gated K+ channel.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Grube,
Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: quinidine sulfate.
2009,
Pubmed
Gu,
Multi-state, 4-aminopyridine-sensitive ion channels in human spermatozoa.
2004,
Pubmed
Hamill,
Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches.
1981,
Pubmed
Herrington,
The suppression of Ca(2+)- and voltage-dependent outward K+ current during mAChR activation in rat adrenal chromaffin cells.
1995,
Pubmed
Horrigan,
Coupling between voltage sensor activation, Ca2+ binding and channel opening in large conductance (BK) potassium channels.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hou,
Reciprocal regulation of the Ca2+ and H+ sensitivity in the SLO1 BK channel conferred by the RCK1 domain.
2008,
Pubmed
Howe,
On the active form of 4-aminopyridine: block of K+ currents in rabbit Schwann cells.
1991,
Pubmed
Li,
Unique inner pore properties of BK channels revealed by quaternary ammonium block.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lingle,
Empirical considerations regarding the use of ensemble-variance analysis of macroscopic currents.
2006,
Pubmed
MacKinnon,
Mechanism of charybdotoxin block of the high-conductance, Ca2+-activated K+ channel.
1988,
Pubmed
Miller,
Charybdotoxin, a protein inhibitor of single Ca2+-activated K+ channels from mammalian skeletal muscle.
,
Pubmed
Navarro,
KSper, a pH-sensitive K+ current that controls sperm membrane potential.
2007,
Pubmed
Navarro,
Ion channels that control fertility in mammalian spermatozoa.
2008,
Pubmed
Niu,
Stepwise contribution of each subunit to the cooperative activation of BK channels by Ca2+.
2002,
Pubmed
Petkova-Kirova,
4-aminopyridine affects rat arterial smooth muscle BK(Ca) currents by changing intracellular pH.
2000,
Pubmed
Schreiber,
Slo3, a novel pH-sensitive K+ channel from mammalian spermatocytes.
1998,
Pubmed
Shen,
Tetraethylammonium block of Slowpoke calcium-activated potassium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes: evidence for tetrameric channel formation.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Snyders,
Time-, voltage-, and state-dependent block by quinidine of a cloned human cardiac potassium channel.
1992,
Pubmed
Tang,
Closed-channel block of BK potassium channels by bbTBA requires partial activation.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Villarroel,
Probing a Ca2+-activated K+ channel with quaternary ammonium ions.
1988,
Pubmed
Voets,
Potent block of volume-activated chloride currents in endothelial cells by the uncharged form of quinine and quinidine.
1996,
Pubmed
Wilkens,
State-independent block of BK channels by an intracellular quaternary ammonium.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Woodhull,
Ionic blockage of sodium channels in nerve.
1973,
Pubmed
Xia,
Multiple regulatory sites in large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels.
2002,
Pubmed
Xia,
Ligand-dependent activation of Slo family channels is defined by interchangeable cytosolic domains.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Xia,
Molecular basis for the inactivation of Ca2+- and voltage-dependent BK channels in adrenal chromaffin cells and rat insulinoma tumor cells.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yao,
Quinidine preferentially blocks the slow delayed rectifier potassium channel in the rested state.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yeh,
Mechanism of action of quinidine on squid axon membranes.
1976,
Pubmed
Yellen,
Ionic permeation and blockade in Ca2+-activated K+ channels of bovine chromaffin cells.
1984,
Pubmed
Yeola,
Molecular analysis of a binding site for quinidine in a human cardiac delayed rectifier K+ channel. Role of S6 in antiarrhythmic drug binding.
1996,
Pubmed
Yeung,
Effects of the ion-channel blocker quinine on human sperm volume, kinematics and mucus penetration, and the involvement of potassium channels.
2001,
Pubmed
Zeng,
Gating properties conferred on BK channels by the beta3b auxiliary subunit in the absence of its NH(2)- and COOH termini.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zhang,
pH-regulated Slo3 K+ channels: properties of unitary currents.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zhang,
Slo3 K+ channels: voltage and pH dependence of macroscopic currents.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
de Lamirande,
Capacitation as a regulatory event that primes spermatozoa for the acrosome reaction and fertilization.
1997,
Pubmed