J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007 Apr 01;1024:1456-61. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00422.2006.

Intracellular PO2 kinetics at different contraction frequencies in Xenopus single skeletal muscle fibers.

???displayArticle.abstract???
Increasing contraction frequency in single skeletal muscle fibers has been shown to increase the magnitude of the fall in intracellular Po(2) (Pi(O(2))), reflecting a greater metabolic rate. To test whether Pi(O(2)) kinetics are altered by contraction frequency through this increase in metabolic stress, Pi(O(2)) was measured in Xenopus single fibers (n = 11) during and after contraction bouts at three different frequencies. Pi(O(2)) was measured via phosphorescence quenching at 0.16-, 0.25-, and 0.5-Hz tetanic stimulation. The kinetics of the change in Pi(O(2)) from resting baseline to end-contraction values and end contraction to rest were described as a mean response time (MRT) representing the time to 63% of the change in Pi(O(2)). As predicted, the fall in Pi(O(2)) from baseline following contractions was progressively greater at 0.5 and 0.25 Hz than at 0.16 Hz (32.8 +/- 2.1 and 29.3 +/- 2.0 Torr vs. 23.6 +/- 2.2 Torr, respectively) since metabolic demand was greater. The MRT for the decrease in Pi(O(2)) was progressively faster at the higher frequencies (0.5 Hz: 45.3 +/- 4.5 s; 0.25 Hz: 63.3 +/- 4.1 s; 0.16 Hz: 78.0 +/- 4.1 s), suggesting faster accumulation of stimulators of oxidative phosphorylation. The MRT for Pi(O(2)) off-kinetics (0.5 Hz: 84.0 +/- 11.7 s; 0.25 Hz: 79.1 +/- 8.4 s; 0.16 Hz: 81.1 +/- 8.3 s) was not different between trials. These data demonstrate in single fibers that the rate of the fall in Pi(O(2)) is dependent on contraction frequency, whereas the rate of recovery following contractions is independent of either the magnitude of the fall in Pi(O(2)) from baseline or the contraction frequency. This suggests that stimulation frequency plays an integral role in setting the initial metabolic response to work in isolated muscle fibers, possibly due to temporal recovery between contractions, but it does not determine recovery kinetics.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 17204578
???displayArticle.link??? J Appl Physiol (1985)
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]