Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
XB-ART-23410
J Comp Physiol A 1992 Sep 01;1712:207-12. doi: 10.1007/bf00188928.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Xenopus exhibits seasonal variation in retinotectal latency but not tecto-isthmo-tectal latency.

Scherer WJ , Udin SB .


???displayArticle.abstract???
1. The tectum of Xenopus receives visuotopic input from both eyes. The contralateral eye's projection reaches the tectum directly, via the optic nerve. The ipsilateral eye's projection reaches the tectum indirectly, via the nucleus isthmi and isthmo-tectal projection. 2. Because of the multi-synaptic nature of the ipsilateral pathway, there is an inherent delay between the time that information from the contralateral eye reaches the tectum and the time that information from the ipsilateral eye arrives at the tectum. The length of the intertectal delay is a function of the latencies of the contralateral and ipsilateral pathways. 3. The length of this intertectal delay has functional, as well as developmental, implications with regard to the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in tectal cell activity and development of orderly synaptic connections. 4. We have found that the latencies of the contralateral and ipsilateral pathways exhibit a seasonal variation, increasing during the winter months. The increases of both latencies during the winter were of similar magnitude, indicating that there were no significant changes in intertectal delay. The seasonal alteration in contralateral latency was not affected by dark-rearing and was affected to only a minor extent by a week-long alteration of ambient temperature.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 1432856
???displayArticle.link??? J Comp Physiol A
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]


References [+] :
Branston, Efferent fibers in the frog optic nerve. 1968, Pubmed