Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
XB-ART-1643
J Toxicol Environ Health A 2005 May 28;6810:811-32. doi: 10.1080/15287390590930234.
Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Biomonitoring of the genotoxic potential of draining water from dredged sediments, using the comet and micronucleus tests on amphibian (Xenopus laevis) larvae and bacterial assays (Mutatox and Ames tests).

Mouchet F , Gauthier L , Mailhes C , Jourdain MJ , Ferrier V , Devaux A .


???displayArticle.abstract???
Management of contaminated dredged sediments is a matter of great human concern. The present investigation evaluates the genotoxic potential of aqueous extracts of five sediments from French channels (draining water from dredged sediments), using larvae of the frog Xenopus laevis. Two genotoxic endpoints were analyzed in larvae: clastogenic and/or aneugenic effects (micronucleus induction after 12 d of exposure) and DNA-strand breaking potency (comet assay after 1 and 12 d of exposure) in the circulating blood. Additionally, in vitro bacterial assays (Microtox and Ames tests) were carried out and the results were compared with those obtained with larvae. Physicochemical analyses were also taken into account. Analytical analyses highlighted in the five draining waters a heavy load of contaminants such as metals and hydrocarbons. The results obtained with the micronucleus test established the genotoxicity of three draining waters. The comet assay showed that all 5 draining waters were genotoxic after 1 d of exposure. Although 3 of them were still genotoxic after 12 d of exposure, DNA damage globally decreased between d 1 and 12. The comet assay can be considered as a genotoxicity-screening tool. Data indicate that both tests should be used in conjunction in Xenopus. Bacterial tests (Ames) revealed genotoxicity for only one draining water. The results confirm the relevance of the amphibian model and the need to resort to bioassays in vivo such as the Xenopus micronucleus and comet assays for evaluation of the ecotoxicological impact, an essential complement to the physicochemical data.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 16020178
???displayArticle.link??? J Toxicol Environ Health A