Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Genesis
2012 Mar 01;503:143-54. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22008.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
From expression cloning to gene modeling: the development of Xenopus gene sequence resources.
Gilchrist MJ
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The Xenopus community has made concerted efforts over the last 10-12 years systematically to improve the available sequence information for this amphibian model organism ideally suited to the study of early development in vertebrates. Here I review progress in the collection of both sequence data and physical clone reagents for protein coding genes. I conclude that we have cDNA sequences for around 50% and full-length clones for about 35% of the genes in Xenopus tropicalis, and similar numbers but a smaller proportion for Xenopus laevis. In addition, I demonstrate that the gaps in the current genome assembly create problems for the computational elucidation of gene sequences, and suggest some ways to ameliorate the effects of this.
Fig 1. Using EST assemblies to accurately define transcript sequences. (a) EST contigs for a pair of Xenopus laevis homeolog genes (H+transporting F1 ATP synthase, epsilon subunit, atp5e), illustrating sensitivity of clustering and accuracy of assembly. The EST assembly for each homeolog is shown, where the consensus sequence is constructed from the aligned EST sequences. Protein alignments are used to determine the frame and position of the ORF. (b) BLASTn alignment of the open reading frames (plus 12 bases upstream) of these two genes illustrates how important knowing both these sequence is to the process of morpholino design. The Gurdon IDs for the assemblies for the A and B homeologs are Xl2.1-LANE.XL433b16.5 and Xl2.1-Ls19H.BX846122.5, respectively.
Fig 2. Accumulation of Xenopus cDNA and EST sequences over time. Computational analysis of sequence submission dates reveals the rates of arrival of different types of gene sequence for the two frogs. Upper panel: cDNA numbers analyzed by individual submission date pooled by month. Lower panel: EST numbers grouped by UniGene library entry, using earliest submission date noted for each library, and pooled by month.
Fig 3. Mis-modeling of genes leads to incorrect sequences in public databases. There are gaps in the Xenopus tropicalis genome assembly in the ifngr2 gene locus, and this has created problems for the gene modeling process. The figure compares alignments for two gene models from different sources and two cDNA based sequences: X. tropicalis gene model A, Ensembl ENSXETT00000000072; gene model B, NCBI XM_002942799.1; EST assembly consensus, Gurdon Xt7.1-TNeu110f24.3; and X. laevis cDNA, NCBI NM_001099874.1. Panel (a) first 400 bp of the assembled EST contig. Visible striations in the EST alignments section indicate the quality of the assembly. The section of the contig sequence missing from the genome sequence is outlined in red. Panel (b) three-way alignment between the 5′-most parts of the EST consensus sequence and the two gene model sequences. Colored boxes and dashed lines link sections of sequence to their positions in the detailed view from the UCSC genome browser page. The red arrow indicates the most likely assembly gap to contain the ‘missing’ sequence. Panel (c) UCSC genome browser view for the whole ifngr2 locus on scaffold_1108, Xt-v4.1, showing BLAT alignments for the EST consensus and gene model sequences. Public EST alignments mapped by UCSC are also shown. Panel (d) a multiple sequence alignment of the resulting translated protein sequences (first ∼70 residues), including a full-length cDNA sequence from Xenopus laevis, showing where the gene model derived protein sequences diverge from the cDNA based sequences.
Fig 4. Systematic analysis for gene model transcript completeness. Transcript sequences are computationally analyzed (a) for the longest open reading frame (ORF), using in-frame ATG (green) and STOP codons (red). Missing UTRs are identified (b) where the ORF runs to the ends of the transcript. Truncated ORFs are identified (c) where protein matches are detected upstream of the most 5′ ATG and/or there is no 3′ STOP codon.
Agrawal,
The miR-30 miRNA family regulates Xenopus pronephros development and targets the transcription factor Xlim1/Lhx1.
2009, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Agrawal,
The miR-30 miRNA family regulates Xenopus pronephros development and targets the transcription factor Xlim1/Lhx1.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Akkers,
A hierarchy of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 acquisition in spatial gene regulation in Xenopus embryos.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Altmann,
Microarray-based analysis of early development in Xenopus laevis.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Amaya,
Xenomics.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Aparicio,
Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes.
2002,
Pubmed
Batzoglou,
ARACHNE: a whole-genome shotgun assembler.
2002,
Pubmed
Blythe,
Chromatin immunoprecipitation in early Xenopus laevis embryos.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bowes,
Xenbase: a Xenopus biology and genomics resource.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Carruthers,
Genetic and genomic prospects for Xenopus tropicalis research.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chalmers,
A Xenopus tropicalis oligonucleotide microarray works across species using RNA from Xenopus laevis.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chang,
Function of the two Xenopus smad4s in early frog development.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chen,
Identification of novel genes affecting mesoderm formation and morphogenesis through an enhanced large scale functional screen in Xenopus.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dale,
Bone morphogenetic protein 4: a ventralizing factor in early Xenopus development.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fritz,
Xenopus homeobox-containing cDNAs expressed in early development.
1988,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gilchrist,
Defining a large set of full-length clones from a Xenopus tropicalis EST project.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Harland,
Xenopus research: metamorphosed by genetics and genomics.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hellsten,
The genome of the Western clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kenwrick,
Pilot morpholino screen in Xenopus tropicalis identifies a novel gene involved in head development.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Khokha,
Depletion of three BMP antagonists from Spemann's organizer leads to a catastrophic loss of dorsal structures.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kinsella,
Ensembl BioMarts: a hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space.
2011,
Pubmed
Klein,
Genetic and genomic tools for Xenopus research: The NIH Xenopus initiative.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Langerveld,
Chronic exposure to high levels of atrazine alters expression of genes that regulate immune and growth-related functions in developing Xenopus laevis tadpoles.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mignone,
Untranslated regions of mRNAs.
2002,
Pubmed
Morin,
Sequencing and analysis of 10,967 full-length cDNA clones from Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis reveals post-tetraploidization transcriptome remodeling.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nagaraj,
A hitchhiker's guide to expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis.
2007,
Pubmed
Picardi,
Computational methods for ab initio and comparative gene finding.
2010,
Pubmed
Pruitt,
NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins.
2007,
Pubmed
Qiu,
The role of miR-124a in early development of the Xenopus eye.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Rana,
Defining synphenotype groups in Xenopus tropicalis by use of antisense morpholino oligonucleotides.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sander,
The opposing homeobox genes Goosecoid and Vent1/2 self-regulate Xenopus patterning.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sayers,
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information.
2011,
Pubmed
Scheibye-Alsing,
Sequence assembly.
2009,
Pubmed
Smith,
Injected Xwnt-8 RNA acts early in Xenopus embryos to promote formation of a vegetal dorsalizing center.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Smith,
Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann organizer in Xenopus embryos.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Voigt,
Expression cloning screening of a unique and full-length set of cDNA clones is an efficient method for identifying genes involved in Xenopus neurogenesis.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
