Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Phenotypes Gene Literature (88) GO Terms (4) Nucleotides (20011) Proteins (77) Interactants (1109) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-480093

Gene Symbol: eef1a1

Gene Name: eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1

Anatomy terms
Keller explant animal cap anterior foregut anterior ventral blood island bone tissue brain branchial arch cement gland central nervous system chordoneural hinge ectoderm egg endomesoderm epidermis eye fat body ... [+]
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data eef1a1.L eef1a1.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 35 and 36
Good quality Poor quality
    
Community Submitted ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
Good quality Poor quality
2 more [+]
      
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30
Gawantka, et al. 1998
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 55 to NF stage 66
Abdallah, et al. 1996
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 66
Newbery, et al. 2011
Good quality Poor quality